{"id":196,"date":"2017-08-30T13:29:07","date_gmt":"2017-08-30T17:29:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/?p=196"},"modified":"2017-08-30T13:29:07","modified_gmt":"2017-08-30T17:29:07","slug":"the-second-circuit-loosens-the-reins-on-insider-trading-prosecutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/2017\/08\/30\/the-second-circuit-loosens-the-reins-on-insider-trading-prosecutions\/","title":{"rendered":"The Second Circuit Loosens The Reins On Insider Trading Prosecutions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After an intervening decision by the United States Supreme Court last year and a rare rehearing of oral argument in March, the Second Circuit has affirmed the conviction of Matthew Martoma, a former portfolio manager at S.A.C. Capital Advisors. In doing so, the Second Circuit has signaled a substantial shift in insider trading law by reversing course from its 2014 decision, which made prosecuting insider trading cases more difficult.<\/p>\n<p>To read the full text of this article, please visit the <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/whitecollarcriminallaw\/2017\/08\/29\/the-second-circuit-loosens-the-reins-on-insider-trading-prosecutions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Duane Morris White Collar Criminal Law blog<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After an intervening decision by the United States Supreme Court last year and a rare rehearing of oral argument in March, the Second Circuit has affirmed the conviction of Matthew Martoma, a former portfolio manager at S.A.C. Capital Advisors. In doing so, the Second Circuit has signaled a substantial shift in insider trading law by &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/2017\/08\/30\/the-second-circuit-loosens-the-reins-on-insider-trading-prosecutions\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Second Circuit Loosens The Reins On Insider Trading Prosecutions&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[161,162],"ppma_author":[238],"class_list":["post-196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-insider-trading","tag-white-collar"],"authors":[{"term_id":238,"user_id":6,"is_guest":0,"slug":"duanemorris3","display_name":"Duane Morris","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/843ff6e7a8fe5fc92109b47a45f34b6cf0ea499e6e788db23456c838b0ae6747?s=96&d=blank&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/appellatelaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}