Last year, President Joe Biden signed Executive Order 14110 on the \u201cSafe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.\u201d Since the issuance of the executive order, a lot of attention has been focused on the provision requiring \u201cthe head of each agency with relevant regulatory authority over critical infrastructure \u2026 to assess potential risks related to the use of AI in critical infrastructure sectors involved, \u2026 and to consider ways to mitigate these vulnerabilities.\u201d Naturally, government agencies generated numerous reports cataloging the well-documented risks of AI. At the same time, nearly every company has implemented risk-mitigation guidelines governing the use of artificial intelligence. To be sure, the risks of AI are real, from privacy and cybersecurity concerns, to potential copyright infringements, to broader societal risks posed by automated decision-making tools. Perhaps because of these risks, less attention has been focused on the offensive applications of AI, and relatedly, fewer companies have implemented guidelines promoting the use of artificial intelligence. Those companies may be missing out on opportunities to reduce legal risks, as a recent report by the Department of Energy highlights.<\/p>\n
Read The Legal Intelligencer<\/em> article<\/a> by Duane Morris partners Phil Cha<\/a> and Brian H. Pandya<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Last year, President Joe Biden signed Executive Order 14110 on the \u201cSafe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.\u201d Since the issuance of the executive order, a lot of attention has been focused on the provision requiring \u201cthe head of each agency with relevant regulatory authority over critical infrastructure \u2026 to assess potential … <\/p>\n