{"id":500,"date":"2025-03-14T12:09:01","date_gmt":"2025-03-14T16:09:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/?p=500"},"modified":"2025-03-14T12:09:03","modified_gmt":"2025-03-14T16:09:03","slug":"occ-reiterates-guidance-on-crypto-asset-activities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/2025\/03\/14\/occ-reiterates-guidance-on-crypto-asset-activities\/","title":{"rendered":"OCC Reiterates Guidance on Crypto-Asset Activities"},"content":{"rendered":"On Friday, March 7, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (\u201cOCC\u201d) issued Interpretive Letter 1183, OCC Letter Addressing Certain Crypto-Asset Activities, reiterating the OCC\u2019s prior guidance regarding the activities in which national banks may engage related to crypto-assets, including crypto-asset custody, certain stablecoin activities, and participation in independent node verification networks such as distributed ledgers. Each of these activities were previously addressed and permitted pursuant to OCC Interpretive Letters 1170, 1172, and 1174, respectively. Interpretive Letter 1183 also rescinds Interpretive Letter 1179, which required national banks to receive a \u201csupervisory nonobjection and demonstrate that they have adequate controls in place before they can engage in these cryptocurrency activities.\u201d

Additionally, \u201cconsistent with Interpretive Letter 1183,\u201d the OCC\u2019s news release notes that the OCC withdrew its participation in the joint statement on crypto-asset risks to banking organizations and the joint statement on liquidity risks to banking organizations resulting from crypto-asset market vulnerabilities.

Taken together, Interpretive Letter 1183, the recission of Interpretive Letter 1179, and the withdrawal from the two joint statements on specific risks to banking organizations related to crypto-asset activities result in a much friendlier approach to these activities by national banks. This release also potentially signals a forthcoming expansion of the market for banks to engage in such activities.

But for now, national banks are able to engage in crypto-asset activities such as: (1) \u201cholding\u201d digital currencies on behalf of customers by taking custody of the unique cryptographic keys associated with such digital currencies (Interpretive Letter 1170); (2) holding deposits from stablecoin issuers, including deposits that constitute reserves for a stablecoin associated with hosted wallets, including any activities incidental to receiving deposits from stablecoin issuers (Interpretive Letter 1172); (3) validating, storing, and recording payments transactions by serving as a node on an independent node verification network (Interpretive Letter 1174); and (4) using independent node verification networks and related stablecoins to carry out other permissible payment activities (Interpretive Letter 1174).

Each of these Interpretive Letters, as is consistent with OCC precedent, acknowledge that these activities are natural outgrowths of a national bank\u2019s traditional role as a financial intermediary and that any such crypto-asset activities should be \u201cdeveloped and implemented consistently with sound risk management practices and should align with banks’ overall business plans and strategies.\u201d The OCC further expects national banks to \u201cconduct a legal analysis to ensure the activities will be conducted consistent with all applicable laws, including applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations and consumer protection laws and regulations.\u201d

Finally, we think it is important to recognize that each of Interpretive Letters 1170, 1172, and 1174 were drafted under the guidance of (and executed by) Jonathan V. Gould, then Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel, but recently nominated by the Trump administration to be next Comptroller of the Currency. We expect more on the crypto-related activities of national banks from the OCC in the future, especially if Mr. Gould is approved as Comptroller in this administration that wants the US to be the \u201cBitcoin Superpower.\u201d
","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Friday, March 7, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (\u201cOCC\u201d) issued Interpretive Letter 1183, OCC Letter Addressing Certain Crypto-Asset Activities, reiterating the OCC\u2019s prior guidance regarding the activities in which national banks may engage related to crypto-assets, including crypto-asset custody, certain stablecoin activities, and participation in independent node verification networks such … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “OCC Reiterates Guidance on Crypto-Asset Activities”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":693,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[502],"class_list":["post-500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"authors":[{"term_id":502,"user_id":693,"is_guest":0,"slug":"jsilvia","display_name":"Joseph E. Silvia","avatar_url":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2024\/09\/silviajoseph-100x100.jpg","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/693"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=500"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/500\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=500"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/bankinglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}