{"id":2116,"date":"2025-04-01T10:29:34","date_gmt":"2025-04-01T14:29:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/?p=2116"},"modified":"2025-04-01T10:29:34","modified_gmt":"2025-04-01T14:29:34","slug":"announcing-the-second-edition-of-the-duane-morris-tcpa-class-action-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/2025\/04\/01\/announcing-the-second-edition-of-the-duane-morris-tcpa-class-action-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Announcing The Second Edition Of The Duane Morris TCPA Class Action Review!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1600\" height=\"900\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2025\/04\/TCPA-2025-Header.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2117\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2025\/04\/TCPA-2025-Header.png 1600w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2025\/04\/TCPA-2025-Header-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2025\/04\/TCPA-2025-Header-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2025\/04\/TCPA-2025-Header-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2025\/04\/TCPA-2025-Header-1536x864.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Jennifer A. Riley, and Ryan Garippo<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Duane Morris Takeaway:<\/em><\/strong><em> The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. \u00a7 227, et seq., has long been a focus of class action litigation. Since the TCPA was enacted 30 years ago, the methods and technology that businesses use to engage and interact with customers has evolved and changed. The trend of states enacting or amending their own mini-TCPAs shows no signs of slowing down, making this subject area a likely continued focus for the plaintiffs\u2019 class action bar in years to come.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To that end, the class action team at Duane Morris is pleased to present the 2025 edition of the <a href=\"https:\/\/online.flippingbook.com\/view\/336691308\/\">TCPA Class Action Review<\/a>. We hope it will demystify some of the complexities of TCPA class action litigation and keep corporate counsel updated on the ever-evolving nuances of these issues.&nbsp; We hope this book \u2013 manifesting the collective experience and expertise of our class action defense group \u2013 will assist our clients by identifying developing trends in the case law and offering practical approaches in dealing with TCPA class action litigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Click <a href=\"https:\/\/online.flippingbook.com\/view\/336691308\/\">here <\/a>to bookmark or download a copy of the T<em>CPA Class Action Review \u2013 2025<\/em> e-book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Stay tuned for more TCPA class action analysis coming soon on our weekly podcast, the Class Action Weekly Wire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Jennifer A. Riley, and Ryan Garippo Duane Morris Takeaway: The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. \u00a7 227, et seq., has long been a focus of class action litigation. Since the TCPA was enacted 30 years ago, the methods and technology that businesses use to engage and interact with &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/2025\/04\/01\/announcing-the-second-edition-of-the-duane-morris-tcpa-class-action-review\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Announcing The Second Edition Of The Duane Morris TCPA Class Action Review!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":583,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[30],"class_list":["post-2116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"authors":[{"term_id":30,"user_id":583,"is_guest":0,"slug":"classactiondefense","display_name":"Class Action Defense","avatar_url":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2020\/10\/dmlogo.jpg","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/583"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2116\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2116"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=2116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}