{"id":270,"date":"2016-02-19T12:48:02","date_gmt":"2016-02-19T16:48:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/?p=270"},"modified":"2016-02-19T12:49:04","modified_gmt":"2016-02-19T16:49:04","slug":"duane-morris-partner-christopher-soriano-quoted-in-law360","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/2016\/02\/19\/duane-morris-partner-christopher-soriano-quoted-in-law360\/","title":{"rendered":"Duane Morris Partner Christopher Soriano Quoted in Law360"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"DMBdyTxt\">Duane Morris partner <a href=\"http:\/\/www.duanemorris.com\/attorneys\/christopherlsoriano.html\">Christopher Soriano<\/a> in the firm\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.duanemorris.com\/offices\/cherryhill.html\">Cherry Hill office<\/a> was quoted in a February 18, 2016 Law360 article (&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.law360.com\/articles\/760463\/3rd-circ-puts-gambling-ban-constitutionality-back-on-table\" target=\"_blank\">3rd Circ. Puts Gambling Ban Constitutionality Back On Table<\/a>&#8220;) detailing the 12-judge Third Circuit panel hearing discussing New Jersey\u2019s efforts to legalize sports betting. This is the third time the appeals court has looked at the issue. Mr. Soriano discussed three possible outcomes: 1) the court could hold that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) is constitutional and N.J.\u2019s partial repeal violates it, resulting in no sports betting; 2) the court could find PASPA constitutional but that the state has complied with the act in its partial repeal, resulting in unregulated sports betting in N.J. casinos and racetracks; or 3) the court could determine that PASPA is unconstitutional and therefore regulated sports betting would be allowed in the state.<\/p>\n<p class=\"DMBdyTxt\">Mr. Soriano\u2019s blog post on the hearing can also be found <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/2016\/02\/17\/repealing-vs-authorizing-part-2-the-third-circuits-hearing-on-sports-betting\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Duane Morris partner Christopher Soriano in the firm\u2019s Cherry Hill office was quoted in a February 18, 2016 Law360 article (&#8220;3rd Circ. Puts Gambling Ban Constitutionality Back On Table&#8220;) detailing the 12-judge Third Circuit panel hearing discussing New Jersey\u2019s efforts to legalize sports betting. This is the third time the appeals court has looked at &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/2016\/02\/19\/duane-morris-partner-christopher-soriano-quoted-in-law360\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Duane Morris Partner Christopher Soriano Quoted in Law360&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[167,9,67],"ppma_author":[271],"class_list":["post-270","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-christopher-soriano","tag-new-jersey","tag-sports-betting"],"authors":[{"term_id":271,"user_id":6,"is_guest":0,"slug":"duanemorris3","display_name":"Duane Morris","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/843ff6e7a8fe5fc92109b47a45f34b6cf0ea499e6e788db23456c838b0ae6747?s=96&d=blank&r=g","author_category":"1","last_name":"Sullivan","first_name":"Margaret","job_title":"","user_url":"http:\/\/www.duanemorris.com","description":"<a href=\"http:\/\/www.duanemorris.com\">Visit the Duane Morris website.<\/a>"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/gaminglaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}