{"id":379,"date":"2015-12-09T12:00:12","date_gmt":"2015-12-09T16:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/?p=379"},"modified":"2015-12-09T12:00:12","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T16:00:12","slug":"supreme-court-to-consider-implied-certification-theory-of-fca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/2015\/12\/09\/supreme-court-to-consider-implied-certification-theory-of-fca\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court to Consider Implied Certification theory of FCA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case involving the implied certification theory under the False Claims Act. Implied false certification occurs when an entity has previously undertaken to expressly comply with a law, rule, or regulation, and that obligation is implicated by submitting a claim for payment even though a certification of compliance is not required in the process of submitting the claim. Many relators have tried to use this theory to turn a regulatory violation into a false claim&#8211;with its concomitant treble damages and statutory damages.<\/p>\n<p>There has long been a split in the circuits regarding the viability of the implied certification theory. As recently as June 2015, the Seventh Circuit rejected the theory, stating that the &#8220;FCA is simply not the proper mechanism for government to enforce violations of conditions of participation contained in\u2014or incorporated by reference into\u2014a PPA [Program Participation Agreement].&#8221; Rejection of this theory recognizes that there administrative procedures designed to address regulatory violations.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, the Ninth Circuit has embraced the implied certification theory, stating &#8220;&#8221;[i]t is the false certification of compliance which creates liability when certification is a prerequisite to obtaining a government benefit.&#8221; The problem in the health care arena is that facilities promise to comply with a myriad of regulations when entering into PPAs, and certify compliance when submitting bills. Thus, under this theory, every single regulatory violation can turn into a false claim.<\/p>\n<p>The health care industry will be closely watching the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling on this important issue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case involving the implied certification theory under the False Claims Act. Implied false certification occurs when an entity has previously undertaken to expressly comply with a law, rule, or regulation, and that obligation is implicated by submitting a claim for payment even though a certification of compliance &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/2015\/12\/09\/supreme-court-to-consider-implied-certification-theory-of-fca\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Supreme Court to Consider Implied Certification theory of FCA&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,413],"tags":[405],"ppma_author":[918],"class_list":["post-379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-law","category-healthcare-litigation-2","tag-false-claims-act"],"authors":[{"term_id":918,"user_id":91,"is_guest":0,"slug":"aemccracken","display_name":"Amy E. McCracken","avatar_url":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2014\/07\/mccrackenamy-125x150.jpg","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=379"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/healthlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}