{"id":193,"date":"2023-11-20T16:20:32","date_gmt":"2023-11-20T20:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/?p=193"},"modified":"2025-07-25T12:50:38","modified_gmt":"2025-07-25T16:50:38","slug":"student-athletes-and-former-athletes-make-their-cases-to-agencies-courts-and-the-president","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/2023\/11\/20\/student-athletes-and-former-athletes-make-their-cases-to-agencies-courts-and-the-president\/","title":{"rendered":"Student-Athletes and Former Athletes Make Their Cases to Agencies, Courts, and the President"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By Zach McCormack and Drew T. Dorner<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As the holidays (and the College Football Playoff!) approach and the NCAA continues to push for federal Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) legislation, current and former student-athletes are arguing their cases to the federal courts, White House, and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).<\/p>\n<p>Potentially groundbreaking hearings\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1rem\">in NLRB Region 31 (covering the Los Angeles area) <\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem\">began on November 7, 2023, regarding allegedly unfair labor charges.\u00a0 The outcome of the hearings, arising out of claims brought by athletes against respondents including the University of Southern California (USC), the Pac-12 Conference (Pac-12), and the NCAA, may dictate whether these entities should be considered \u201cjoint employers\u201d who systematically misclassify employees as \u201cstudent athletes,\u201d as the athletes argue.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Administrative law judge Eleanor Laws is presiding over the hearings.\u00a0 If ALJ Laws decides that the athletes should be classified as employees, the respondents will have a new set of legal issues to consider under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including minimum-wage and overtime compensation obligations (subject, of course, to appeal).\u00a0 Furthermore, if the athletes prevail, other hurdles for the respondents could include developing compliance measures related to social security, workers\u2019 compensation, health and safety protections, ensuring protections against discrimination and harassment, and recognizing a statutory right to unionize and collectively bargain for a share of collegiate sport revenues.\u00a0 While ALJs are independent decision-makers, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo has already indicated that, in her opinion, certain players at colleges and universities should qualify as employees of their institutions.\u00a0 The hearings could last until February 2024.<\/p>\n<p>While the decision in this case would only directly affect the parties to the action, other athletic conferences and universities are almost certainly interested in the outcome, given that similar claims could be brought against them, in which the judge\u2019s order could be cited as persuasive authority.<\/p>\n<p>The NLRB case is not the only major legal action concerning NIL.\u00a0 As our colleagues <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/classactiondefense\/2023\/11\/07\/athletes-secure-class-certification-on-monetary-relief-claims-in-nil-battle-in-california-federal-court-with-the-ncaa-and-power-5-conferences\/\">covered in detail<\/a>, on November 3, 2023, Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California certified three classes seeking to recover compensation for use of their NIL.\u00a0 The plaintiffs in that case, including Power Five conference players in football, men\u2019s basketball, and women\u2019s basketball, have demanded back pay related to the use of their NIL during television broadcasts.\u00a0 A favorable ruling could result in more than $4 billion in damages.<\/p>\n<p>Outside the courtroom, President Biden and other White House officials met with former college football players to discuss the rights of college athletes.\u00a0 In the meeting, former players <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/sports\/college\/2023\/11\/08\/biden-administration-favors-college-athletes-benefits-ncaa\/71504704007\/\">reportedly<\/a> presented their cases for player safety, compensation to student-athletes, Title IX, and unionization.\u00a0 Notably, however, neither Biden nor his staff made any commitment to push for passage of any of the <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/2023\/08\/06\/flurry-of-new-nil-activity-in-congress\/\">bills<\/a> currently pending in Congress or for any other legislation or regulations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Zach McCormack and Drew T. Dorner As the holidays (and the College Football Playoff!) approach and the NCAA continues to push for federal Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) legislation, current and former student-athletes are arguing their cases to the federal courts, White House, and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Potentially groundbreaking hearings\u00a0in NLRB &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/2023\/11\/20\/student-athletes-and-former-athletes-make-their-cases-to-agencies-courts-and-the-president\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Student-Athletes and Former Athletes Make Their Cases to Agencies, Courts, and the President&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":572,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[339],"class_list":["post-193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"authors":[{"term_id":339,"user_id":572,"is_guest":0,"slug":"dtdorner","display_name":"Drew T. Dorner","avatar_url":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2022\/07\/dornerdrew-100x100.jpg","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/572"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/sportslaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}