{"id":109,"date":"2016-06-13T18:00:24","date_gmt":"2016-06-13T22:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/?p=109"},"modified":"2020-08-04T16:24:35","modified_gmt":"2020-08-04T20:24:35","slug":"california-shark-fin-soup-ban-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/2016\/06\/13\/california-shark-fin-soup-ban-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"California Shark Fin Soup Ban Upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark-fin-soup.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-112 alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark-fin-soup-300x236.jpg\" alt=\"shark fin soup\" width=\"212\" height=\"167\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark-fin-soup-300x236.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark-fin-soup-768x603.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark-fin-soup-1024x804.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark-fin-soup.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 212px) 100vw, 212px\" \/><\/a><em><strong>By Christopher Yeh<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>After years of legal challenges, shark fin soup is off the menu for good in California.<\/p>\n<p>Shark fin soup is a traditional Chinese dish frequently served as a luxury item at special occasions such as weddings.\u00a0 It\u2019s a controversial menu item because some fishermen harvest the fins by catching sharks, slicing off the fins, then tossing the shark back in the ocean.\u00a0\u00a0 <!--more-->This practice, called &#8220;finning,&#8221; leaves the shark unable to swim, causing it either to starve to death or fall prey to predators.\u00a0 Certain shark species require water to move through their gills constantly, so without the ability to swim, they asphyxiate.<\/p>\n<p>Because of this brutal and wasteful fishing practice, the\u00a0Federal Government\u00a0enacted the Shark Finning Prohibition Act,\u00a0 which prohibits this type of fishing.\u00a0 (<em>See<\/em> 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1857(1)(P), (R).)\u00a0 The Act bars the possession or transfer of shark fins on and between fishing vessels, but it does not prohibit the possession or sale of shark fins after they&#8217;ve found their way to land.\u00a0 In 2011, California took it a step further by banning the possession and sale of shark fins altogether. (Cal. Fish &amp; G. Code \u00a7\u00a7 2021, 2021.5.) \u00a0The law took effect in July 2013 and with a few exceptions, made shark fin soup illegal in California.<\/p>\n<p>Asian-American groups and fish merchants\u00a0challenged the\u00a0California law in federal district court, claiming that it discriminated against the Asian-American community, put people out of work, and was preempted by Federal law.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-111 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/shark.jpg\" alt=\"shark\" width=\"211\" height=\"115\" \/><\/a>Their challenge failed. In 2014, the district court ruled that the Shark Fin Law is &#8220;facially neutral,&#8221; and that plaintiffs presented no persuasive evidence indicating that the California legislature\u2019s real intent was to discriminate against Asian-Americans rather than to accomplish the Law\u2019s stated &#8220;humanitarian, conservationist, and health goals.\u201d\u00a0 (<em>Chinatown Neighborhood Ass&#8217;n v. Harris<\/em>, 33 F. Supp. 3d 1085,\u00a01097\u00a0(N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2014).)<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, and upheld the California law.\u00a0 (<em>Chinatown Neighborhood Ass&#8217;n v. Harris<\/em>, 794 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2015).\u00a0)<\/p>\n<p>On May 23, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert to review the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s ruling, thereby leaving\u00a0the lower court\u2019s decision in place and ending the plaintiffs&#8217;\u00a0case against the California law. (<em>Chinatown Neighborhood Ass&#8217;n v. Harris<\/em>, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3464 (U.S., 2016).)<\/p>\n<p>California&#8217;s ban is part of larger trend among states to ban the ingredient.\u00a0 Although this decision means the end of authentic shark fin soup in California, chefs have found ways to replace the ingredient with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/08\/30\/nyregion\/customers-embrace-shark-fin-substitutes.html\">more sustainable alternatives<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Photo credits:\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Great_white_shark#\/media\/File:Great_white_aqurium.jpg\">Brockten Inaglory<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Shark_fin_soup#\/media\/File:Chinese_cuisine-Shark_fin_soup-05.jpg\">Audrey from Seattle (Wikipedia)<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Christopher Yeh After years of legal challenges, shark fin soup is off the menu for good in California. Shark fin soup is a traditional Chinese dish frequently served as a luxury item at special occasions such as weddings.\u00a0 It\u2019s a controversial menu item because some fishermen harvest the fins by catching sharks, slicing off &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/2016\/06\/13\/california-shark-fin-soup-ban-upheld\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;California Shark Fin Soup Ban Upheld&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[54,81,12,108,200,111,112,107,113,110,109],"ppma_author":[201],"class_list":["post-109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-california-law","tag-california-restaurant-law","tag-california-restaurants","tag-chinese-food","tag-christopher-yeh","tag-finning","tag-preemption","tag-shark","tag-shark-fin-soup","tag-shark-finning","tag-soup"],"authors":[{"term_id":201,"user_id":6,"is_guest":0,"slug":"duanemorris3","display_name":"Duane Morris","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/843ff6e7a8fe5fc92109b47a45f34b6cf0ea499e6e788db23456c838b0ae6747?s=96&d=blank&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.duanemorris.com\/thelegaldish\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}