Member of Financial Action Task Force (FATF)?\u202fNo,\u202fVietnam is not currently a member of FATF.
\nVietnam is a member of the Asia\/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG). For more information about the assessment of the implementation of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML\/CFT) measures in Vietnam, please consult the\u202fAPG website.
\nOn FATF Blacklist?\u202fNo. However, Vietnam is currently on the FATF’s grey list
\nMember of Egmont?\u202fNo.
\nOverview of country risks
\nVietnam’s deeper integration into the regional and world economy for the past few years has been a great opportunity for international money laundering crimes. However, money laundering activities only became clearly visible recently though bank accounts opening, securities trading, gambling, illegal transfer of foreign currencies out of the country, use of credit cards, etc.
\nCombating money laundering\u202fhas become one of the top concerns, not only for the State Bank of Vietnam, but also for other relevant authorities in Vietnam. According to a report of the State Bank of Vietnam, in 2012, suspicious transactions had\u202fa total value of VND51,000 billion, while in 2013\u202fit was VND79,000 billion and in 2014, the value went up to VND119,000 billion. This shows an increasing and alarming number of transactions suspicious of money laundering. We note that the Law on Anti-money Laundering took effect on January 1, 2013.
\nIt seems, however, that the\u202fAML legal framework is still insufficient, guiding implementation remains unclear, awareness of credit institutions of money laundering is low, ability to detect money laundering activities is weak, information technology in\u202fAML activities is insufficient, and in particular the punishment regime for violating acts of the AML law is only formalistic. The government, especially the State Bank of Vietnam, is strongly recommended to tighten\u202fits regulations in this sector.
\nKey directives\/legislative framework
\n\u2022\tLaw on Prevention of and Anti Money Laundering No. 14\/2022\/QH15, issued by the National Assembly on November 15, 2022 (the AML law);
\n\u2022\tDecree No. 19\/2023\/ND-CP dated April 28, 2023 issued by the government on detailing the implementation of certain provisions of the AML law (Decree 19);
\n\u2022\tDecree No. 88\/2019\/ND-CP dated November 14, 2019 issued by the government on sanctions for administrative violations against currency and banking legal regulations (Decree 88), amended by Decree 143\/2021\/N\u0110-CP;
\n\u2022\tDecree No. 340\/2025\/ND-CP dated December 25, 2025, issued by the government on sanctions for administrative violations against currency and banking legal regulations (Decree 340), to replace Decree 88 and be effective from 9 February 2026;
\n\u2022\tDecision No. 11\/2023\/Q\u0110-TTg dated April 27, 2024 of the Prime Minister stipulating the threshold for large transactions that must be reported (Decision 11);
\n\u2022\tCircular No. 09\/2023\/TT-NHNN on guiding the implementation of certain regulations on anti-money laundering, issued by the State Bank of Vietnam on July 28, 2023; and
\n\u2022\tPenal Code No. 100\/2015\/QH13 issued by the National Assembly on November 27, 2015, as amended by Law No. 12\/2017\/QH14 dated June 20, 2017 (Penal Code 2017). Penal Code 2017 became effective January 1, 2018.
\nWho are the regulators\/monitoring authorities?
\nWho are the affected\/reporting entities?
\nThe following state authorities are responsible for reporting, preventing, and fighting against money laundering activities:
\n\u2022\tSBV is mainly responsible to the government for state administration\u202fand implementation of AML regulations.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Public Security is responsible for collecting, receiving and investigating information of money laundering related crimes.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of National Defence is responsible for exchanging information and documents on money laundering activities aimed at financing for proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in Vietnam and foreign countries with the State Bank of Vietnam.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Finance is responsible for implementing AML measures in insurance business, securities sector, accounting service, prize-winning games and casinos, lottery, betting and other service sectors under the state management of the Ministry of Finance.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Construction is responsible for implementing AML measures in real estate business sector, except real estate leasing, subleasing and real estate consulting services.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Justice is responsible for implementing AML measures applicable to the notary public and law practising sectors.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Industry and Trade is responsible for implementing AML measures applicable to trading in precious metals and gems sectors, except for trading in gold bars and gold jewellery and fine arts.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Planning and Investment is responsible for implementing AML measures applicable to the sectors under its management.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Home Affairs is responsible for implementing AML measures applicable to associations, social funds, charity funds and religious institutions.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Foreign Affairs is responsible for implementing AML measures applicable to foreign non-governmental organisations.
\n\u2022\tMinistry of Information and Communications is responsible for implementing AML measures applicable to telecommunications or Internet network-based game business sector.
\n\u2022\tThe People’s Procuracy and the People’s Court coordinate with other agencies in the investigation, prosecution, and resolution of money laundering crimes.
\n\u2022\tPeople’s Committees at all levels are responsible for conducting legal training on\u202fAML in the province, coordinating with state authorities to implement policies, strategies and plans to prevent and fight money laundering.
\n\u2022\tThe Anti-Money Laundering Steering Committee is responsible for assisting the prime minister in preparing strategy, plans, policies and programs in the process of preventing and fighting against money laundering:
\no\tclient acceptance policy;
\no\tprocesses and procedures to identify clients, verify and update client information;
\no\ttransactions which must be reported;
\no\tthe process of review, detection, handling and reporting of suspicious transactions; the way to communicate with the clients who make suspicious transaction;
\no\tinformation keeping and security;
\no\tapplying temporary measures and principles of handling the cases of transaction delay;
\no\treporting and information supply regime to the State Bank of Vietnam and the competent state agencies;
\no\tprofessional training on the prevention of and combating money laundering;
\no\tinternally controlling and auditing the compliance with the policies, regulations, processes and procedures related to the prevention of and combating money laundering, responsibilities of each individual and division in the implementation of internal rules in the prevention of and combating money laundering.
\nFor financial institutions
\n\u2022\tWhere\u202fclients open accounts or set up transactions with the financial institutions for the first time.
\n\u2022\tWhere\u202fclients do not have a bank account or\u202fhave made no transactions for the past six months, or deposit, withdraw or make a bank transfer of at least VND 400,000,000, or a foreign-currency amount of equal or greater value per day, except for final settlements or withdrawals of savings interest, credit card debt repayments, repayments of loans to financial institutions, instalment\u202fpayments registered with financial institutions, withdrawals of profits from securities or bond investment portfolios.
\n\u2022\tWhere there are doubts about transaction or the parties concerned in transactions are related to the money laundering.
\n\u2022\tWhere there are doubts about the accuracy or completeness of the clients identification information previously collected.
\nFor relevant non-financial institutions or individuals:
\n\u2022\tDoing business in prize-winning games, including prize-awarding electronic games; telecommunications network-based games, Internet-based games; casinos; lottery tickets: clients implementing high value transactions (i.e., over VND70 million per day).
\n\u2022\tDoing real estate business and management services, except for real property leasing, subleasing, and consulting services: when providing these services to the buyer, purchaser and asset owner.
\n\u2022\tTrading in precious metals and stones: when clients performing the sale and purchase transaction in cash of precious metals and stones with value of over VND400 million per day.
\n\u2022\tProviding legal agreement services: when acting on behalf of the customer to perform a transaction related to establishment, administration or management of legal agreements.
\n\u2022\tProviding services of establishment, management and executive of enterprise; supplying registration office, address or place of business; supplying services of company representative: clients requesting such services.
\n\u2022\tProviding services of director and secretary provision of the enterprise to a third party: third party and director\/secretary to such director.
\nLegal requirements for KYC
\nCustomer due diligence
\nThe application of measures to identify clients depends on the results of money-laundering risk assessment. Procedures for management of money laundering risks cover classification of customers by low, medium and high level of risk. In particular, the above-mentioned services providers\/entities must update the client identification information on a regular basis during the period\u202fduring which they have relations with the clients.
\nIn addition, clients must also be classified into different groups, product and services used, their place of residence or headquarters, based on different risk exposure levels. Customer risk ratings based on customers; products, services used or to be used by customers; geographic locations of customers’ residence or head office and other factors (Art 4.2(c) – Circular 9\/2023\/TT-NHNN).
\nReporting requirements\/obligations
\nRecordkeeping
\nInformation, documents, records relating to customer identification, results of the reporting entity’s analysis and assessment of customers and\/or reporting transactions and other related documents must be kept for at least five years from closing date of the transaction or the date of account closure or the reporting date. Reports of high-value transactions (i.e., from VND400 million), suspicious transactions and transactions of electronic money transfer exceeding VND500 million or equivalent amount in foreign currency (for domestic transfer) or $1,000 (for inbound or outbound transfer) and information, documents and records of the transactions, must be kept for at least five years from the date of the transaction.
\nTipping off
\nThe reporting entity\/ individual, management or employees of reporting entity\/individual is not allowed to inform a person involved in a suspicious transaction that it has reported, or will report, the transaction to the State Bank of Vietnam.
\nWhistle-blowing
\nThe AML law only sets out regulations on reporting to the following state agencies,\u202frather than whistle-blowing:
\n\u2022\tState Bank of Vietnam;
\n\u2022\tInvestigating agencies, agencies assigned to conduct a number of investigative activities, or People’s Procuracies, national security protection agencies under the People’s Public Security;
\n\u2022\tState inspection agencies, agencies assigned to perform the function of conducting the specialised inspection of reporting entities.
\nOffences
\nEnforcements
\nIf the parties related to the transactions are included in the blacklist or there are grounds to believe that the transaction required to be performed is related to the criminal activities or requested by competent state authorities, the reporting entity\/individual must apply measures to delay the transaction within a maximum of three working days and must immediately report in writing and notify via phone to the competent state agencies and the SBV for cooperation. If the reporting entity\/individual does not receive any feedback from the competent state agencies after three working days, it can proceed with the transaction.
\nIn addition, the reporting entity\/individual must block the accounts or seal or temporarily seize assets of the individuals\/organisations upon having the decision of competent state agencies under the law, and must report on the implementation to the State Bank of Vietnam.
\nPenalties
\nPersons violating the AML law are subject to administrative sanctions of up to VND500 million, discipline or criminal penalty depending on the nature and seriousness of such violations. The criminal sanctions varies from one year to a maximum of 15 years’ imprisonment, together with partial or whole confiscation of assets, monetary fine of up to three times of the violated amount, abandonment of holding certain positions or titles from one to five years.
\nThe criminal sanctions against corporate legal entities include monetary fine of VND1 billion up to VND20 billion, together with business operation suspension of one to three years, banning from particular business field operations of one to three years, or forced termination and liquidation.
\nInternal procedures and training
\nPursuant to article 24 of the AML law, reporting entities\/individuals must establish internal procedures on prevention and combating money laundering, with the following contents:\u202f
\n\u2022\tcustomer acceptance policy;
\n\u2022\tcustomer identification procedures and processes;
\n\u2022\trisk management policies and procedures;
\n\u2022\tprocedures for reporting of should-be-reported transactions;
\n\u2022\tsteps in examining, detecting, handling and reporting suspicious transactions; methods of contact with customers performing suspicious transactions;
\n\u2022\tstorage, security and confidentiality of information;
\n\u2022\tapply provisional measures, principles for handling postponement of transactions;
\n\u2022\tregimes for reporting or providing information to the State Bank of Vietnam and other competent state authorities;
\n\u2022\trecruitment and training of personnel specialising in AML activities;
\n\u2022\tinternal control, audit of compliance with policies, regulations, regulatory processes and procedures relating to AML activities; responsibilities of each natural person or department for implementation of internal rules and regulations on AML.
\nSanctions
\nInternational conventions
\nInternational cooperation in the field of prevention of and combating money laundering includes: (i) exchange and provide information on prevention of and combating money laundering; (ii) determining and blocking assets of the violating persons; (iii) performing judicial assistance; (iv) research, training, information support, technical assistance, financial aid and AML experience exchange; and (v) other aspects. The process, procedures and cooperation methods are in accordance with international agreements to which Vietnam is a party.
\nCTF – Countering terrorist finance
\nThe Ministry of Public Security is tasked with the preparation of a list of organisations and individuals related to terrorism and terrorist finance (blacklist). The reporting entity\/individual must promptly report to the competent anti-terrorism authorities, and at the same time send reports to the State Bank of Vietnam upon detecting organisations and individuals to conduct transactions included in the blacklist or when there is evidence that other organisations and individuals commit acts related to the money laundering crime for terrorism financing.
\nAt the same time, the reporting entity\/individual must apply measures to delay the transaction and block the accounts or seal or temporarily seize assets of the individuals\/organisations.
\nAnti-bribery and corruption laws
\nCorruption is widespread throughout Vietnam. For information, Vietnam ranks 88\/180 according to the 2024 Corruption Perception Index. Sectors most affected by corruption are public administration and security; health sector, judiciary, and land management. The Vietnamese government acknowledges the negative impact of corruption on both Vietnam’s future prosperity and the party’s own legitimacy, and thus has adopted one of the most comprehensive and ambitious anti-corruption laws in Asia. The anti-corruption legal framework has seen some improvements after the adoption of the Anti-corruption Law by the National Assembly in 2005 (as amended in 2007, 2012 and 2018) and the National Strategy on Anti-corruption to 2030.
\nHowever, in the last\u202f10 years of implementation, considering the increasing level of complexity of corruption cases, the current legal framework has been proved to be inadequate to combat corruption in Vietnam. This prompted the Vietnamese government to refine the current regime to make the policies fully effective and operational in practice.
\nThere is no definition of “bribery” under Vietnam laws. In essence, however, it could be defined as an act of offering, promising, making or receiving money or anything of value (minimum threshold: VND 2 million (approx. $90) or intangible benefit: no clear guidance but sex, job positions, and education acceptance offerings may be considered) to induce or influence an act\/omission or decision. The current laws only target people with positions and power (i.e., state officials). Please note the receipt of minimum VND 1 billion is subject to death penalty.
\nThis country profile was kindly provided by Dr. Oliver Massmann (omassmann@duanemorris.com), general director of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Member of Financial Action Task Force (FATF)?\u202fNo,\u202fVietnam is not currently a member of FATF. Vietnam is a member of the Asia\/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG). For more information about the assessment of the implementation of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML\/CFT) measures in Vietnam, please consult the\u202fAPG website. On FATF Blacklist?\u202fNo. However, Vietnam is … <\/p>\n