Property Owner Is Strictly Liable for Building Code Violation


The owner of a building open to public use will be strictly liable for damage or injury resulting from a code violation, under a decision issued by Massachusetts’ highest court.  Overruling a 15-year precedent, the court held that strict liability is not limited to code violations affecting fire safety (the essence of a 1999 decision), but applies to any code violation of a building open to public use.[Read More]

Duane Morris' Construction Group Nominated for 2014 Chambers USA Award for Excellence


Duane Morris is pleased to announce that the firm's Construction Group has once again been nominated for one of the prestigious Chambers USA Awards for Excellence. This is the fourth overall nomination for the group, which has been recognized among the top national practices by Chambers for the past several years. Duane Morris is one of only five firms to be finalists in the construction category this year.

[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Duane Morris Partner Albert Bates, Jr. to Present at the Deloitte Energy Conference


Duane Morris partner Albert Bates, Jr., will be presenting at the 2014 Deloitte Energy Conference: A Global Industry . . . Competing Locally, which will be held on Tuesday, May 13, and Wednesday, May 14, 2014, at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland. Mr. Bates will serve as a panelist during the Elective Session – Sector Breakouts on Power on May 14, 2014, where he will discuss strategic considerations of major capital projects, including evolving project delivery systems and inherent risks, as well as proactive project risk management and controls[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Property Owner’s Liability under CERCLA for Unpaid Remediation Subcontractor


A federal appeals court ruled that a landowner is not liable under CERCLA[1] for amounts due to a subcontractor, when the owner had already paid the prime contractor for cleanup work.  The prime contractor, fully paid, failed to make payment to subs and then went out of business.  Although the sub argued that CERCLA required the property owner to pay for cleanup, the court held (decision available here) that the property owner had discharged its obligations under CERCLA when it fully paid the prime contractor for the cleanup work.  The sub still retained lien rights against the property (which allowed partial recovery), but could not rely on the federal cleanup statute as a mechanism to ensure payment from the property owner in these circumstances.


[1]  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.  The federal law imposes liability on a property owner for the cost of cleaning up contamination on the property. 

Georgia House Declines to Vote on Broad P3 Legislation


In case you missed it, last week the Georgia House let the legislative session end without voting on Georgia SB 255, a broad enabling legislation for a wide range of public private partnerships (“P3”). SB 255 would enable the state and political subdivisions to utilize P3 procurement for any project that “meets a public purpose and has previously been identified as a public need by the elected or appointed leaders.” Qualifying projects expressly included “operation of any existing public facility in a manner that results in reduced operating costs,” including public schools, local government buildings and higher education institutions.

SB 255 passed the Georgia Senate earlier this year in overwhelming fashion (43-8), but the house never voted on the bill.  And with the session now ended, the bill is effectively dead and would need to be re-introduced next session.

Georgia’s current P3 procurement laws allow P3 financing for projects related to  certain water reservoirs, facilities, and systems.  The P3 process for water projects includes multiple opportunities for public comment, bidders responding to written request for proposals and the applicable authority engaging in discussions with respondents.  Under the current, more limited procedure, announcement of the “most meritorious” proposal is then followed by period or competitive negotiations and an award based on value and ability of the final project’s characteristics to meet goals consistent with state, regional and local comprehensive plans.

P3 has become a topic of interest lately because of the coinciding need for infrastructure improvements and the public lethargy in funding such improvements.  Georgia Governor Deal stated (when he signed Georgia’s P3 legislation on water infrastructure), “This stretches public dollars by attracting partners to move forward with public works projects that will benefit the citizens of the state for generations. The lack of funding has hampered progress, even with a punishing drought in recent memory.”  Still, even with the benefits that P3 might bring, broad and sweeping delegation of public services to the private sector encounters skepticism, and Georgia chose not to enact broad legislation this time around.  We’ll report back on this issue next session.

 
 
 
 

Construction Workforce Trends Point to Increased Risk on Construction Projects


Tony Dungy once stated, "It’s not necessarily who has the most talent but what team sticks together and executes their fundamentals the best." This success principle – executing on the fundamentals – applies unforgivingly in construction, an industry where every mistake must be corrected, every cost accounted for and every delay in work comes at significant costs.  Numerous construction professionals have pointed out that executing fundamentals has become more difficult in the construction industry for a number of reasons, including contractor and subcontractor defaults, international procurement, transitions in how risks are contractually apportioned, and increasingly specialized construction materials and methods of construction, among others.  And by numerous accounts, keeping a "team [that] sticks together" will become increasingly difficult too, as workforce availability problems look to be both abrupt and sustained. 

[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Waiver of Subrogation – “Work” versus “Non-Work”


The Indiana Court of Appeals has been busy addressing the scope of subrogation waivers.  The latest decision is an argument over whether the waiver extends to property that is not part of the contractor’s “Work” (as defined in the AIA contract form used by the parties).  The court[1] decided to follow what has been referred to as the majority rule on this issue, and held that the waiver of subrogation bars subrogated claims concerning non-Work property.  I wrote about a similar case on a related issue just last month.

[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Managing Snow and Weather Related Delays on a Construction Project


This winter it seems like no one has been able to escape the fury of Mother Nature.  As a result, construction projects all over the country are now behind schedule.  Because “time is money” for all of the project participants, disputes related to time extensions, liquidated damages, acceleration claims, and other delay damages are expected.  In anticipation of these disputes, contractors and owners should review their contracts and consult with an attorney before submitting or responding to a weather related claim.

[Read More]

Recent Changes in New York City's Standard Construction Contract


With its new Standard Construction Contract, issued in December 2013, the City of New York (the "City") has implemented numerous significant changes as compared with its 2008 standard contract.[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Arbitrator Jurisdiction: Don’t Just Talk the Talk, But Walk the Walk


Can a party repeatedly object to the arbitrator’s jurisdiction, continue in the arbitration process, and then contest the arbitration award after the fact?  That issue was recently considered by a federal court in Michigan.[1]  The court held that a subcontractor who filed a counterclaim and participated in discovery and arbitration hearings, had waived its rights to contest the jurisdiction of the arbitrator, despite written objections periodically placed on the record.  This is another warning to those who want or need to seriously challenge the jurisdiction of arbitrators: don’t continue in the process if you’re going to object to arbitrability!

[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Itemization of Mechanic’s Lien Not Necessary Where Construction Contract Apprised Owner of Lienor’s Claim


Section 38 of the NY Lien Law requires a holder of a mechanic’s lien to supply an itemized statement of labor and/or material which make up the amount for which a lien is claimed. The itemization is necessary to apprise the owner of the details of the lienor’s claim. The itemization, however, may excused in the limited circumstance where the lienor alleges that it has fully performed a fixed price construction contract.

[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Bertha and the Big (or not so big) Warranty


The tunnel-boring machine Bertha has been halted underneath Seattle for more than two months.  The most recent news is that seals protecting the TBM’s bearings may need to be repaired or replaced.  Another tidbit of news is that Bertha is still under warranty.  Do you think Bertha will be extracted from the partially-completed tunnel, packed up and shipped back to the manufacturer for repair or replacement?  You laugh, but the scope of a construction-related warranty is the stuff of major battles.[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Waiver of Subrogation – Two Reminders


Diesel fuel is spilled during renovation of a library, damaging both the work in progress and the surrounding building or land.  Damages may exceed $500,000, but the owner’s pollution coverage is apparently limited to $5,000.  Is the owner barred from pursuing the contractor and others based on the waiver of subrogation language in the contract?  The Indiana Court of Appeals focused on one issue in its analysis:[1] that the waiver of subrogation applies only to claims paid relative to the “Work”, and not to other surrounding elements that were damaged.  A second issue seems to an outsider to be equally if not more important: the waiver does not apply if the insurance policy has not covered the damage.[Read More]
 
 
 
 

Duane Morris' Robert Hendrickson and Ron Oliner on "Public Works Projects and Municipal Bankruptcies"


The good news is that public works construction projects for municipalities are projected to remain a major sector of construction activity for the foreseeable future. The not-so-good news is that municipal bankruptcy filings are on the rise, and they are likely to increase. [Read More]
 
 
 
 

Lifespan of a Bridge Span


Reports of the prematurely-deteriorating Champlain Bridge in Montreal have sparked renewed discussion about the lifespan of major bridges.  The Champlain Bridge, completed in 1962 with an expected lifespan of 100 years, has had significant deterioration, much attributed to a $2 million savings at the time of its construction; see commentary here.  In short, the combination of pre-stressed concrete girders and the lack of a drainage plan resulted in an influx of salt-infused water from winter road-salting operations, and deterioration of the pre-stressing cables.  The replacement is estimated to cost between $3 and $5 billion.[Read More]
 
 
 
 
 

Duane Morris Construction Law

Duane Morris’ acclaimed Construction Group shares insights on legal developments impacting the business of construction.

« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today
 
© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.
The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.