Guidance for Controlling Drug Prices

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced its support of the federal government’s use of “march-in rights” as a mechanism to control the price of pharmaceuticals. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) late last year issued its “Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights” that would fundamentally change the use of march-in rights by allowing the government to exercise price control under the Bayh-Dole Act, which the FTC announced its support for last week. This shift is the latest effort by federal agencies to lower drug prices in the wake of President Joe Biden’s Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy.

Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris website.

Is Misclassification of Workers an Unfair Method of Competition?

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is signaling its intent to get further involved in employment practices after its activity of the last year and a half in proposing a ban on noncompete clauses in employment contracts and signing a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to bolster the FTC’s efforts to promote competitive U.S. labor markets.

Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris website.

Preserve Materials During Pendency of Antitrust Investigation, FTC Says

Companies and individuals must be aware of their legal obligations to preserve communications when involved in government investigations or litigation, especially in light of new preservation standards from the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice. Due to concerns with the increased use of collaboration tools like Microsoft Teams and ephemeral messaging applications like Signal, the agencies are updating the language they include in standard preservation letters and requests for information, including second requests, voluntary access letters, civil investigative demands, other compulsory legal processes and grand jury subpoenas.

Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris website.

FTC and DOJ Issue Highly Anticipated Merger Guidelines

On December 18, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) jointly issued new Merger Guidelines. The new guidelines amend, update and replace the numerous versions of merger guidelines previously issued by both agencies, including the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines and the Vertical Merger Guidelines that were issued in 2020 and later withdrawn by the FTC in 2021. Below are our key takeaways, followed by some discussion of how the agencies apply the guidelines and then a deeper-dive into some industry-specific considerations.

Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris website.

Sanofi Terminates Proposed Licensing Agreement with Maze after FTC Complaint

On December 11, 2023, Sanofi released a statement that it will terminate its proposed $755 million licensing agreement with Maze Therapeutics (Maze) shortly after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an administrative complaint and authorized filing a complaint for preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts to block the deal.

Read more on the Duane Morris Life Sciences Blog.

What’s Next for Antitrust Enforcement After DOJ’s No-Poach Prosecution Dismissed?

On November 15, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted a motion by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to dismiss indictments in its last remaining criminal no-poach antitrust case, United States of America v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC, et al., No. 3:21-cr-00011-L (N.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2023). The government’s voluntary dismissal of the case—the first criminal no-poach indictment brought by the DOJ in early 2021—could signify the beginning and end of DOJ’s quest to enforce no-poach agreements as per se violations of the Sherman Act.

Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris website. 

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress