A California federal judge has denied the temporary restraining order of a man suing Fliff Inc. for allegedly offering online gambling disguised as free sweepstakes, saying the California resident failed to provide the court with evidence he would succeed on his underlying lawsuit claims of unfair competition and unjust enrichment. […]
Fliff attorney William Gantz of Duane Morris LLP told Law360 Friday that his client had followed the law.
“The law is very clear,” Gantz told Law360. “Online companies can change their terms of use.”
Gantz noted the original terms of use also required arbitration to resolve a dispute. The company filed a motion to compel arbitration on Aug. 11.
To read the full text of this article, please visit the Law360 website (subscription required).