Massachusetts Proposed Legislation Limiting Employee Non-Compete Agreements

Massachusetts made headlines in the area of non-compete law in 2009 when a bill was introduced in the state legislature that would have (had it been signed into law) prohibited employee non-competition agreements. Now, four years later, the same state senator who introduced the 2009 bill has partnered with another legislator to introduce a new bill that, if signed into law, would make non-compete agreements longer than six months presumptively unreasonable in Massachusetts.

Among the key provisions of the proposed legislation, termed the “Noncompetition Agreement Duration Act,” are the following:

(1) The Act would apply to employee non-competition agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2014;

(2) The Act would not apply to (i) covenants not to solicit or hire employees of the employer; (ii) covenants not to solicit or transact business with customers of the employer; (iii) non-competition agreements made in connection with the sale of a business or substantially all of the assets of a business, when the party restricted by the noncompetition agreement is an owner of at least a ten percent interest of the business who received significant consideration for the sale; (iv) non-competition agreements outside of an employment relationship; (v) forfeiture agreements; or (vi) agreements by which an employee agrees to not reapply for employment to the same employer after termination of the employee;

(3) An employee non-competition agreement restricting an employee’s mobility for no longer than six months would be presumptively reasonable;

(4) An employee non-competition agreement restricting an employee’s mobility for longer than six months would be presumptively unreasonable;

(5) An employee non-competition agreement determined by a court to be unreasonable in duration would be unenforceable, unless: (i) the employee breached his or her fiduciary duty to the employer; (ii) the employee unlawfully took, physically or electronically, property belonging to the employer; or (iii) the employee had, at any time, received annualized taxable compensation from the employer of $250,000 or more; and

(6) When any of the three exceptions in #5 above were present, a court would have the discretion (but would not be compelled) to enforce the employee non-competition agreement for any duration determined by the court to be appropriate.

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress