Amicus Brief Drafted for NAM in Support of Reversing Ruling that Moderna, Rather than the Government, Must Face a Multibillion-Dollar Patent Infringement Suit

Duane Morris partners Brian Pandya and Seth Rokosky represented the National Association of Manufacturers in its amicus brief encouraging the Federal Circuit to undo a lower court’s ruling that Moderna, and not the government, must face a multibillion-dollar patent infringement suit over its COVID-19 vaccine. The brief warned that if contractors can’t rely on the government when it commits to bearing the liability of patent infringement suits, it would undermine the government’s ability to procure manufactured goods that are vitally important for responding to national crises and for keeping the daily operations of government running. Read the amicus brief here.

Duane Morris Appellate Lawyers Recognized by Chambers USA

We are pleased to announce that three Duane Morris Appellate division lawyers have been recognized by Chambers USA.

Here’s what clients are saying about our appellate lawyers:

  • “[Rob Byer’s] ability to synthesize complex issues into short, concise arguments, and his natural talents for the back and forth of an appellate proceeding are nothing short of amazing.”
  • “Robert Palumbos is in the upper echelon of appellate lawyers. He is very intellectual and he has a complex practice.”
  • “Benjamin Shatz is one of the best qualified appellate lawyers with whom I have had the pleasure of working.”

Los Angeles Lawyers

Benjamin Shatz: Litigation Appellate

Pittsburgh Lawyers

Robert L. Byer: Litigation: Appellate

Philadelphia Lawyers

Robert M. Palumbos: Litigation: Appellate

Avoiding Pitfalls: Jurisdictional Considerations for Appeals

By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr.

The article explains that in New York, only “aggrieved” parties can appeal from proper, written orders or judgments within 30 days. Appeals must follow strict timing and procedural rules; missing deadlines usually results in dismissal. Courts can excuse minor errors, but proper filing and notice are crucial to keep the right to appeal.

Read the full article from the New York Law Journal on the Duane Morris LLP website.

2025 Annual Report of Clerk of the Court of Appeals

By Thomas R. Newman

We had expected, in keeping with Chief Judge Wilson’s expressed hope in the 2023 Annual Report, that the court would continue to decide more appeals each year until eventually arriving at the over 200 yearly average total dispositions during the 22-year tenure of Chief Judges Kaye and Lippman. But that did not happen. The court decided only 119 appeals (79 civil and 40 criminal), down one from the 120 decided in 2024. We hope the court will increase its caseload this year.

Of the 79 civil appeals decided by the Court in 2025, the jurisdictional predicate for 39 (49%) was permission of the Court of Appeals, 18 (23%) permission of the Appellate Division, 14 (18%) dissents in the Appellate Division, and in 4 (0.5%) a constitutional question was involved. Appx. 4. Stipulations for judgment absolute under CPLR 5601(c) continue to be zero; a wise decision.

Read the full article from the New York Law Journal on the Duane Morris LLP website.

This article was co-authored with Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr.

Duane Morris Partner Benjamin Shatz Named President of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers

Benjamin Shatz, a partner in the firm’s Los Angeles office, has been named as the next president of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers.

The California Academy of Appellate Lawyers is the nation’s oldest lawyers’ organization dedicated to appellate practice. Its members are California lawyers with substantial appellate experience, who are elected to membership after rigorous scrutiny of their reputation, character and appellate advocacy skills.

The ‘Aggrievement’ Requirement

In a New York Law Journal article, Thomas R. Newman & Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr. , explain that only “aggrieved” parties—those harmed or denied relief—can appeal court decisions under CPLR 5511. Courts can assess aggrievement on their own, and simply disagreeing with a ruling isn’t enough. There are exceptions, like non-parties with affected interests or appeals on alternative grounds. Understanding these rules is crucial for proper appellate standing. Read the full article.

New Jersey Supreme Court Adopts “Merits Briefing” – What Practitioners Need to Know

By Robert M. PalumbosPaul P. JosephsonChristopher H. CaseyAndrew R. Sperl and Justin G. Mignogna

In a February 26, 2026, notice, the Supreme Court of New Jersey announced sweeping amendments to the court rules governing briefing before the court. The new framework provides for merits briefing in all appeals taken on or after February 10, 2026. These changes represent the most significant overhaul of the court’s briefing procedures in years and carry important implications for appellate practitioners, amicus participants and anyone following the court’s docket.

Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris LLP website.

Leah Mintz Reappointed Co-Chair of the Philadelphia Bar Association Appellate Courts Committee

Duane Morris attorney Leah Mintz has been reappointed co-chair of the Philadelphia Bar Association’s Appellate Courts Committee for the third year. Ms. Mintz focuses her practice on appellate litigation, white-collar criminal defense, and complex commercial litigation. She has briefed and argued appeals before the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third and Sixth Circuits, as well as before all three Pennsylvania appellate courts.

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress