Trumps Signs Executive Order to Reschedule Cannabis: A Dramatic Shift in Federal Cannabis Policy

On December 18, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order to expedite the administrative process of rescheduling cannabis, marking one of the most dramatic shifts in federal cannabis policy in the past few decades.

Under current federal law, cannabis is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance—the most restrictive category of drugs.  Schedule I controlled substances are defined as having no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.  Schedule I substances include inherently dangerous drugs, such as heroin and LSD.

The Executive Order directs the Attorney General to expedite rescheduling cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III.  Schedule III controlled substances are defined as having a lower potential for abuse and currently accepted medical uses, including substances such as ketamine and Tylenol with codeine. 

The rescheduling process is handled through the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) and the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”).  In 2022, at the direction of President Biden, DEA and HHS commenced the rescheduling process.  Both HHS and the Department of Justice issued recommendations to reschedule cannabis, but the process eventually stalled, and there has been no movement on rescheduling since January 2025 until today. 

Rescheduling cannabis to Schedule III will not only allow for medical research into cannabis, one of President Trump’s main selling points in issuing the Executive Order, but may also provide long awaited relief to cannabis operators, owners, investors, and other industry participants.

One of the most prominent and immediate benefits of rescheduling will be the removal of cannabis from the clutches of Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code.  Section 280E disallows standard business deductions for businesses engaged in the trafficking of Schedule I or II controlled substances.  Once cannabis is rescheduled, cannabis operators will likely decrease their current tax liabilities and improve their financial viability. 

What rescheduling will NOT do is open up the door for interstate commerce and may not immediately increase the number of federally chartered banks open to banking in the industry as many are still waiting for passage of the SAFER Banking Act or similar legislation. FinCEN guidance is not impacted by the Executive Order, which means that onerous reporting and other obligations for banks will remain in place. As such, any impact to banking will likely be minimal, as banks’ compliance obligations will remain the same until such time that the SAFER Banking Act or similar legislation is passed by Congress.

The Executive Order also seeks to expand research and access to CBD products.  This comes on the heels of the funding bill passed to end the government shutdown, which included a controversial provision to close the loophole created by the 2018 Farm Bill and reclassify low-THC hemp products as controlled substances.  The ban on low-THC hemp products goes into effect in November 2026. 

While not full federal legalization, today’s Executive Order could mark the beginning of the end in draconian federal cannabis policy.  The rescheduling process will take some time, and the Executive Order could still be challenged by Congress and stake holders in the cannabis industry, but operators should remain cautiously optimistic.

Cannabis Consumption Lounges Delayed in Nevada – Again

In June 2022, the Nevada Cannabis Compliance Board (CCB) approved regulations pertaining to the licensing and operation of cannabis consumption lounges in accordance with its authority under Assembly Bill 341 (2021). Following the CCB’s implementation of the regulations, the license application window was opened from October 14 – October 27, 2022. During the application period, the CCB received ninety-nine applications, and on November 30, 2022, the CCB identified forty applicants who would be prospective holders of consumption lounge licenses. Of the total forty applicants identified, twenty were applicants that already held cannabis retail licenses in Nevada and intended to operate consumption lounges attached to their retail dispensaries, ten were social equity applicants that intended to operate standalone consumption lounges, and ten were non-social equity applicants that intended to operate standalone consumption lounges.

While cannabis consumption lounges seemed to be moving in the right direction in Nevada, prospective operators have experienced hurdles that have delayed the opening of consumption lounges, including changes to the regulations. Now, those prospective operators are faced with more challenges, including concerns regarding indoor air quality at consumption lounges. Specifically, the regulations include stringent air quality standards that require, among other things, that air be circulated every two minutes – a requirement that is even more stringent than those imposed on cigar bars, taverns and hookah lounges. Installing ventilation systems that meet the requirements set forth in the regulations would be a costly undertaking for an operator, with some industry experts estimating that a compliant HVAC system would cost nearly half a million dollars to install. Moreover, monthly utility bills are expected to be in the thousands of dollars. With cannabis operators already experiencing difficulties accessing capital due to the status of cannabis under federal law, and the volatility in the economic market as a whole further exacerbating capital constraints, some prospective operators simply do not have the capital required to build out a consumption lounge that complies with the strict regulations.

Some operators who are already in the build-out phase have been forced to pause construction while they attempt to raise the funds required to address the air quality requirements. Other operators have elected to halt construction until a final version of the regulations has been adopted, in order to avoid having to revise their build-out plans if the regulations are further revised.

When the CCB first approved the regulations, many predicted that consumption lounges would be open in Las Vegas as early as the end of 2022. That time line was subsequently pushed back to the second quarter of 2023, with many hoping that consumption lounges would open by 4/20 and, if not, by early summer in time for the tourists flocking to Sin City for their summer vacations. As prospective operators struggle to complete their build-outs, industry insiders have again revised the time line to sometime in the third or fourth quarter of 2023.

For now, the only consumption lounge where tourists can legally consume cannabis products is NuWu Cannabis Marketplace, which also includes a retail dispensary. Because it is located on tribal land, it is not required to obtain a consumption lounge license from the state.

House Approved Its First Appropriations Bill that Supports Tribal Cannabis Production and Distribution

Tribal leaders of federally-recognized tribes that have legalized cannabis, either medicinally or for adult use, may soon be able to breathe a sigh of relief. The Fiscal Year 2023 appropriations bill for the Department of the Interior (the “2023 Appropriations Bill”), awaiting Senate approval after having passed the House, includes a provision prohibiting the use of any Interior funds to enforce federal laws that otherwise criminalize cannabis on Indian lands where tribal law authorizes its use, distribution, possession, or cultivation. There are, however, two important caveats.

First, if the tribe is subject to state law that is contrary to tribal law, or the tribal land is located in a state where cannabis is illegal, the non-enforcement provision does not apply. Some tribes are still subject to Public Law 280, a relic from the 1950s, which gives certain states criminal jurisdiction over tribal members on tribal land. For those tribes, state criminal law would control and cannabis use, distribution, possession, or cultivation would remain illegal on tribal land.

Second, tribes must take reasonable steps to ensure tribal laws regarding cannabis are compatible with certain federal policy objectives, such as prohibiting cannabis use for minors and ensuring cannabis is not diverted to states or tribes where it is illegal, used to support organized crime or other illicit drugs, or brought onto federal public lands.

These policy objectives mirror ones that had been included in the “Wilkinson Memo,” a 2014 Obama-era statement of policy emphasizing the Department of Justice’s non-enforcement policy against tribes for legal cannabis businesses (both medicinal and adult-use). That memo gave tribes and tribal members some comfort that legalization efforts would not subject them to prosecution, or prevent federal funds from continuing to support their communities. When Attorney General Sessions rescinded that policy statement in 2017, tribal legalization was left in political limbo. The Biden administration has remained silent on the issue of tribal legalization, despite President Biden’s pardon announcement earlier this month.

If the Senate approves the 2023 Appropriations Bill, it will give tribes that have already legalized cannabis some much-needed clarity on where the federal government stands on enforcement of the federal Controlled Substances Act. During the Obama administration, tribes in states like Washington and Nevada found success in compacting with the state to create a uniform system of distribution. Tribes in California do not have that option as the state has prevented any such partnership, despite the state and tribes separately legalizing adult-use. More recently, some tribes located in New York went ahead without state partnership while state adult-use licenses linger in the approval process. Indeed, more than 100 dispensaries have opened in New York on Native land.

For tribes in states where cannabis remains prohibited in some or all forms, or the state has criminal jurisdiction over tribal members, the 2023 Appropriations Bill is a reminder that the complex system of federal and state law governing tribal affairs continues to create issues affecting tribal sovereignty.

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress