“Has your institution received government funding? Is government funding behind your patents? Are you licensing patents that were developed with government support? If so, you really should listen to this informative webinar. Your rights and economic interests could be dramatically impacted by March-In Rights.”
Discover the nuances of March-In Rights in patent law through a recent presentation by Duane Morris partner, Ryan C. Smith, Ph.D.
To access the presentation, follow this link.
Today, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and Department of Justice (“DOJ”) (collectively, the “Agencies”) jointly released the 2023 Merger Guidelines . The 2023 Merger Guidelines outline the “factors and frameworks the agencies utilize when reviewing mergers and acquisitions,” including both horizontal and vertical transactions. The 2023 Merger Guidelines finalize the draft merger guidelines that were released in July 2023 and effectively update and replace the 2010 Horizontal merger Guidelines and Vertical Merger Guidelines that were issued in 2020 and later rescinded by the FTC in 2021. The 2023 Merger Guidelines are not law, but past merger guidelines have been persuasively cited by courts, and they give insight as to how the Agencies view the competitive impact of transactions.
Given the Agencies’ focus on competition in the Life Sciences space, companies should be aware of all of the factors and frameworks outlined in the 2023 Merger Guidelines. In particular, certain components of the 2023 Merger Guidelines reflect recent enforcement trends, including the threshold for when the Agencies consider certain transactions presumptively illegal, an emphasis on elimination of potential entrants in concentrated markets, a focus on how transactions will affect access to products or services used by rivals, an examination of whether a transaction furthers an already-dominant market position or is part of a trend towards consolidation, and concerns with both cross-ownership and common ownership in firms that have competitive relationships.
On December 11, 2023, Sanofi released a statement that it will terminate its proposed $755 million licensing agreement with Maze Therapeutics (Maze) shortly after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an administrative complaint and authorized filing a complaint for preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts to block the deal.
Under the terms of the proposed licensing agreement between Genzyme Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sanofi, and Maze, Sanofi would acquire an exclusive license to Maze’s glycogen synthase 1 products and related technology, including its candidate MZE001, a drug in development to treat the potentially fatal genetic order Pompe disease. According to a statement by Jason Coloma, Ph.D., Maze’s CEO, the FTC’s challenge “is the first time ever the FTC has moved to block a license of a Phase 1 investigational medicine.” The challenge seems consistent, however, with revised draft merger guidelines proposed by the FTC and Department of Justice that indicate that transactions “should not entrench or extend a dominant position” by, for example, “[e]liminating a nascent competitive threat.”
Following enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act, which provides for Medicare drug price negotiations, the White House has announced new actions to lower drug costs, including the release of a proposed framework for agencies to exercise march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act to promote public accessibility to tax-payer-funded drugs. If adopted, the framework would make it easier for the government to exercise march-in rights and would impact the value of license rights to government-funded inventions.
Read the full Alert on the Duane Morris LLP website.
