patent – Duane Morris TechLaw

February 24, 2026February 24, 2026 by Duane Morris

Patent Prosecution and Artificial Intelligence – Part 1

Artificial intelligence is reshaping how patent attorneys approach prosecution work. From prior art searches to claim drafting, AI tools promise efficiency gains that were unimaginable a decade ago. But with these promises come legitimate questions about reliability, risk, and the boundaries of responsible use.

This five-part blog series examines AI’s role in patent prosecution through multiple lenses. Rather than offering a simple thumbs-up or thumbs-down verdict, we explore the mainstream consensus, the contrarian arguments, and the evidence that would settle the debate. Whether you’re an AI enthusiast or a skeptic, this AI-Assisted series will give you a framework for thinking critically about these tools. Read the full series.

December 19, 2019April 19, 2023 by Eric J. Sinrod

Patents Created by Artificial Intelligence?

Machine learning is increasing exponentially. As a result, artificial intelligence (AI) now is powering many aspects of our lives. If you ask Siri or Alexa, they will tell you that AI computers are performing surgeries, flying planes, driving cars and winning at games. What’s next?

What’s next might include inventions created by AI. Indeed, several months ago, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) sought public comments on this topic.

Continue reading “Patents Created by Artificial Intelligence?”

November 1, 2011July 18, 2016 by Eric J. Sinrod

Controlling E-Discovery Costs In Patent Cases

Electronic discovery can be time-consuming, burdensome and expensive. Indeed, at times, e-discovery can be the tail that wags the litigation dog.
As a consequence, Chief Judge Randall Rader of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on behalf of an E-Discovery Committee, recently introduced a Model Order for Patent E-Discovery.

The Committee’s discussion underpinning the Model Order notes that federal district courts have inherent power to control their dockets in the interests of time and economy. Accordingly, it is the Committee’s view that the Model Order may be a “helpful starting point for district courts to use in requiring the responsible, targeted use of e-discovery in patent cases.”

Continue reading “Controlling E-Discovery Costs In Patent Cases”