Kompetenz-Kompetenz is the universally accepted principle that empowers arbitration tribunals to decide on their own jurisdiction. However, recent decisions in the Indian Supreme Court and the Singapore High Court provide timely reminders on whether and when such jurisdictional rulings can be referred to the local supervisory court. Parties must remember the inconsistency across jurisdictions in timings its challenge to the Tribunal’s ruling on jurisdiction.
Duane Morris & Selvam LLP has contributed to the latest edition of the Global Arbitration Review: The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2027.
Our featured chapter, “India v Singapore as enforcement forums: pro-enforcement rhetoric and evolving judicial practices,” provides a comprehensive and comparative analysis of how both jurisdictions handle the enforcement of arbitral awards.
While both India and Singapore publicly champion pro-arbitration and pro-enforcement frameworks, their day-to-day judicial practices reveal key practical distinctions. Singapore courts intervene narrowly, strictly prioritizing the finality of awards. Conversely, while India has historically maintained a broader supervisory role, recent legislative and judicial reforms are actively working to limit intervention and streamline enforcement.
In this insightful piece, authors Ramiro Rodriguez, Priyank Srivastava, and Ignatius Lee review landmark cases from both jurisdictions, exploring what these shifting dynamics mean for businesses when selecting an arbitral seat or enforcement forum.
About Duane Morris & Selvam LLP Duane Morris & Selvam LLP is the joint law venture between Duane Morris LLP and Selvam LLC, with its headquarters in Singapore. By way of its global platform and extensive range of legal services, the firm helps companies conduct business in and out of Asia, the United States, Latin America, the United Kingdom and beyond. In addition to the excellent skills of its lawyers, clients benefit from the cultural fluency and key relationships that the firm has developed over many years of practising law throughout the region. The firm has a presence in the key markets of Southeast Asia, including Singapore, Shanghai, Sydney, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh, as well as an office in Myanmar. Supporting these regional offices, the firm operates a series of country desks for India, Korea, and Japan. It is regularly ranked among the region’s leading law firms by Chambers & Partners, The Legal 500 and IFLR1000.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm’s full disclaimer.
SINGAPORE, 6 May 2026 – Selvam LLC is pleased to announce its recognition in the 2026 edition of Benchmark Litigation Asia Pacific, a leading guide to the region’s top dispute resolution firms and practitioners.
SINGAPORE, March 13, 2026 – Duane Morris & Selvam LLP is pleased to announce the promotion of certain associates to senior positions within the firm’s Corporate and Dispute practice.
Escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East are disrupting global supply chains, maritime routes, and energy markets. The blockade over the Strait of Hormuz, and curtailed aviation routes, is having real time impact on business continuity. Companies with operations, suppliers, or contractual relationships connected to the region should act now to manage their legal and commercial exposure.
Singapore has positioned itself as a leading jurisdiction for digital transformation and artificial intelligence (“AI”) governance through a deliberately pro-innovation regulatory model. Rather than adopting a single, binding AI statute, Singapore relies on a combination of national strategies, voluntary governance frameworks, sector-specific guidance, and practical implementation tools. This approach reflects a policy choice to encourage responsible AI adoption while preserving flexibility as technologies evolve.
For businesses and legal practitioners operating in or from Singapore, AI compliance is not a matter of satisfying a single “AI Act,” but of navigating an ecosystem of interlocking frameworks and sectoral expectations. This article outlines that ecosystem, explains how digital and AI governance operate in practice, and highlights most relevant developments.
On January 23, 2026 (EST), the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an Initial Determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-1413, ruling that the Respondent Kangxi Communication Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. —a premier Chinese leading company specializing in high-performance Wi-Fi RF front-end modules for IoT, automotive, and telecommunications—did not infringe upon the patent rights of the Complainants Skyworks Solutions, Inc., Skyworks Solutions Canada, Inc., and Skyworks Global Pte Ltd. In addition, it has found no violation of subsection (b) of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337[1]. This victory marks a significant milestone in an intensive 18-month intellectual property defense led by a cross-border legal team from Duane Morris LLP and Duane Morris & Selvam LLP.
The Chambers Energy & Infrastructure M&A 2025 Global Practice Guide was launched recently.
Duane Morris & Selvam’s Directors Priyank Srivastava, Ramiro Rodriguez, and Associate Colette Tan, as well as Duane Morris’ Partner Shelton M. Vaughan have contributed their valuable insight to the Singapore Chapter on Trends and Developments.
