Estonia – Russian diplomat expelled, in part for sanctions violations

The Foreign Ministry of Estonia has issued a press release stating that it has declared a Russian diplomat persona non grata requiring the diplomat to leave Estonia.

The press release stated, in part:

The diplomat in question has been directly and actively involved in undermining the constitutional order and legal system of Estonia, as well as in dividing Estonian society, contributing to the crimes against the state, including several offences related to sanctions violations. At present, one citizen of the Republic of Estonia has been convicted for carrying out these crimes.” 

No further information is yet available on the specifics of the alleged violations, or of the conviction of the Estonian national.

Germany and Bulgaria – raids at German manufacturer with three charged with sanctions offences

Last week more than 140 officers from the Munich Customs Investigation Office and the Munich I Public Prosecutor’s Office conducted raids on several premises in Munich and Baden Württemberg.

The subject of the raids was a machine tool manufacturer suspected of exporting 20 machines valued at more than €5.5m to Russia in breach of the EU’s sanctions.

It has subsequently been reported that the company was Spinner GmbH.

It has also now been reported that three individuals have been charged with sanctions offences. They have not been named.

The press release from the Munich Public Prosecutor’s Office also stated that the Bulgarian authorities conducted contemporaneous raids at premises in Bulgaria with support and coordination from Eurojust.

Guernsey – licence revoked and fines imposed on financial services firm and individual

The Guernsey Financial Services Commission has issued a release regarding the imposition of several fines and the revocation of regulatory authorisations for a firm and an individual.

The firm ITI Trade Ltd was fined £175,000, and Mr Alexi Filatov was personally fined £35,000.

An order has been issued preventing Mr Filatov from holding a regulated position for 2 years and 10 months.

ITI Trade Ltd agreed to surrender its licence.

The compliance failings were first identified by the Commission in 2019, and the firm undertook (or purported to undertake) various remediation programmes (the results of which were doctored for the purpose of submissions to the Commission), before the Royal Court appointed Administration Managers over the firm in July 2022.

The failings relate to a lack of sanctions and AML compliance, due diligence and screening with the Guernsey entity “used to appear to provide investment services from Guernsey, when in reality much of the business was conducted in Russia”.

Estonia – sanctioned Russian timber enforcement

Estonia’s Customs has issued information on its current enforcement activity in relation to sanctioned Russian timber.

While noting the use of Kazakhstan, China and Georgia as prominent third countries used for attempts to import Russian timber, Estonian Customs notes:

  • 618 inspections conducted on imported timber;
  • 79 shipments refused entry to Estonia;
  • 100 proceedings based on a fraudulent origin of the timber commenced; and
  • 23 sanctions violations identified.

The release does not identify the outcomes of the 23 identified violations.

United Kingdom – OFSI imposes a fine of £300,000 for breach of EU Russian sanctions

OFSI has published a Penalty Notice fining a UK company Markom Management Limited (“MML”) £300,000 for breaches of The Ukraine (European Union Financial Sanctions) (No.2) Regulations 2014.

The fine was for issuing a payment instruction to return an overpayment of £416,590.92 to a Russian bank account belonging to a designated person.

The fine was initially set at £400,000, but was reduced through the ministerial review process.

This penalty is noteworthy for a number of reasons:

  1. This enforcement action dates from events in 2018. While underscoring the slowness of OFSI’s enforcement steps it also reinforces the lack of a limitation period for the UK’s sanctions, and the fact that the UK continues to enforce the EU sanctions that were in place before Brexit.
  2. The self-reporting by MML was considered insufficient to trigger a discount to the imposed penalty.
  3. The conduct that warranted the penalty was a person in the UK sending a payment instruction to a bank in Russia to transfer funds to another bank in Russia. This is a reminder of the broad reach of the UK’s criminal jurisdiction when it comes to communications sent in or out of the jurisdiction. This penalty notice sits uneasily alongside the recent civil decision in Celestial Aviation Trading Ireland Ltd & Ors v Volga-Dnper Logistics BV [2025] EWHC 1156 (Comm).

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress