Estonia – details of eleven Russian sanctions convictions

Further to the earlier post about Estonia having obtained 8 criminal convictions during 2024, we can publish details of the criminal convictions for breaches of the EU’s Russian sanctions that have been published on Estonia’s searchable gazette of published judgments.

As well as one conviction obtained in 2022, below we are publishing summaries of seven of the convictions from 2024 and three from 2025 (not including the conviction made public on 16 April 2025) as well as machine translations of the respective judgments.

The sentences range from fairly small monetary fines up to custodial sentences of 5 years in jail.

  1. Judgment of 10 October 2022 – Petr Rafalovich (a Belarus national) was convicted and given a two month sentence following which he was to be deported to Belarus and given a five-year ban from re-entering Estonia. He was also ordered to pay a penalty and costs of €1,250.40.

The offence was the attempt to export a 3D printer and an electromagnetic positioner. Mr Rafalovich was carrying false papers indicating the goods were destined for an Armenian company, as well as other papers indicating the true recipient to be a Russian company.

2. Judgment of 5 February 2024 – Victor Manilo was convicted and ordered to pay €2,680 as a fine.

The offence was the attempted export of €14,000 in physical currency to Russia.

3. Judgment of 14 February 2024 – Galina Sergejenkova was convicted and ordered to pay €3,960, such payment suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. A separate payment of costs and a penalty of €1,434.96 were to be paid straightaway.

The offences were two attempts to transport physical currency (of €900 and €1,000 respectively).

4. Judgment of 27 February 2024 – Evgeniy Kozlovtsev was convicted and given an eight month sentence suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. He was also ordered to pay a penalty and costs of €1,430.

The offence was the attempted export to Russia of two bottles of wine greater than the €300 luxury threshold. It was the man’s second attempt at such exports.

5. Judgment of 8 March 2024 – Aleksei Bond was convicted and given a five month prison sentence suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. He was also ordered to pay a penalty and costs of €1,555.

The offence was the attempted export of a luxury watch valued at €13,900 to Russia.

6. Judgment of 27 March 2024 – Lev Pylkin was convicted and ordered to pay a penalty of €1,190, as well as confiscation of the cash he attempted to export to Russia.

The offence was the attempted export of €2,560 in physical currency across the border to Russia. He had previously attempted to export cash at which time the details of the offence had been explained. The judgment is the dismissal of an appeal against the conviction and sentence.

7. Judgment of 17 October 2024 – Ruslan Sibilev was convicted and ordered to pay a fine of €79,557.50 as well as confiscation of a large number of rifle scopes, binoculars and other equipment.

The offences were committed through the acquisition of a range of sanctioned goods from a Portuguese company and an Austrian company, with Sibilev acting to coordinate further transport for the export of the goods to Russia. The orders were placed between May 2022 and April 2023. The total value of the goods ordered was nearly €1 million.

8. Judgment of 16 December 2024 – Oleg Osipov was convicted and sentenced to 8 months in prison suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. He was also ordered to pay €13,230, including 100% of the fee earned as part of the sanctioned transactions.

The offences were committed through Osipov providing a brokering service for the export of luxury goods to buyers in Russia between May and July 2023. The goods included electrical goods, phones, alcohol, navigation systems and various automotive parts. Osipov contracted with others to deliver the goods and took a brokering fee for arranging the transactions.

9. Judgment of 14 February 2025 – Demyan Belyakov was convicted and sentenced to 5 years in jail and ordered to pay €8,231 in costs and other penalties. In addition a large volume of goods were confiscated.

The offences were committed through the actual and attempted export to Russia of hundreds of silencers and firearm flash suppressors between February and June 2024.

10. Judgment of 20 February 2025 – Andrei Klychkov was convicted and sentenced to serve two months in prison plus a further period of 2 years and 10 months suspended for a probationary period of 4 years. €5,000 was also confiscated and he was ordered to pay costs of €2,581.

The offences were committed by the attempted export of parts for firearms, to Russia.

11. Judgment of 21 March 2025 – Aleksandr Ivantsov was convicted and sentenced to 4 years, 11 months and 27 days (after deducting 3 days of pre-trial detention) suspended for a probationary period of 5 years and other conditions including a requirement for prior permission to be away from his house for more than 15 days, and permission to leave Estonia. He was also ordered to pay €2,215 and had 70,550 rubles, and other goods, confiscated.

The offence was committed by the attempted export of six pairs of night-vision binoculars.

This case is related to that above for Ruslan Sibilev with Mr Ivantsov being one of the people used to try and physically carry the goods across the border into Russia.

United Kingdom – three penalties imposed by HMRC for breaches of Russian trade sanctions

On 4 November 2024, HMRC published a Notice to Exporters regarding a compound penalty of £58,426.45 imposed for breaches of Russian trade sanctions.

The Notice included the line:

Since February 2022, HMRC has issued six compound settlements against UK companies that have breached the Russia sanctions regulations for a total of £1,363,129, including one in August 2023 for £1 million“.

This struck a chord because, as captured in this blog, only three compound penalties had been publicly imposed by HMRC for breaching Russian sanctions. So a Freedom of Information request was made about the other three.

The response is here.

The response discloses details of three compound penalties (totalling c. £237,000) from August and September 2022 and April 2023. These had each been previously published, but had not previously been described as relating to Russian sanctions.

  • August 2022 – £1,000.00 was paid relating to the export of goods in breach of The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
  • September 2022 – £19,689.20 was paid relating to the export of goods in breach of The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
  • April 2023 – £217,012.50 was paid relating to the export of goods in breach of The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.

It is unclear why these penalties were not previously described as relating to breaches of Russian sanctions.

The FOIA request also asked for the names of the individuals or companies which were the subject of the penalties; whether any had self-reported; and what (if any) confiscation of the proceeds of crime was applied. These questions were not answered.

Latvia – details of the 10 Russian/Belarusian sanctions convictions from 2022 and 2023

With gratitude to a Paulis Iljenkovs of the Latvian FIU who pointed me to the website of Latvian anonymised case law, we can publish details of the criminal convictions to date under the EU’s Russian and Belarusian sanctions regimes.

As per an earlier post (here) it had been reported that there had been seven convictions to over 2022 and 2023. When including cases where companies and individuals were both convicted the correct figure is 10 convictions in 7 cases.

The website including Latvia case law is here. The case numbers provided below can be entered into the “Atlasīt pēc arhīva numura:” window to retrieve the judgments themselves which are in Latvian.

A. Case K77-3109-23. Riga City Court. 30 October 2023.

This case concerned the export of a Bentley Mulsanne Speed luxury vehicle to Russia that was sold for €112,552.69 in breach of the EU’s prohibitions on the export of luxury goods.

The company was convicted and fined €111,600 and had the full proceeds from the sale of the car confiscated as well.

The senior individual within the company was also convicted and personally fined €62,000.

In an earlier post we had reported that the total fine from this case was €170,000, but this sum excluded the confiscation.

B. Case K77-2464-23. Riga City Court. 25 October 2023.

The case was the prosecution of an individual who worked for Rossiya Segodnya, a Russian state media channel (the company is not named in the judgment, but is known from earlier press releases as per our earlier post).

The journalist was prosecuted for making “economic resources” available to a designated person, with Rossiya Segodnya having a designated person – Dmitry Kiselev – as its Director General.

The court held that the work product prepared during the course of employment constituted “economic resources” and that making these available to a designated person was a breach of the asset freeze imposed on Kiselev under the EU’s sanctions.

The fine was €6,820.

C. Case K77-2465-23. Riga City Court. 26 June 2023.

This case is twinned with Case B (K77-2464-23) above. The prosecution was of another journalist working for the same organisation, and the same case theory of the work product constituting “economic resources” was pursued.

In this instance, however, the journalist pleaded guilty and expressed remorse.

As part of a plea deal the individual was sentenced to 140 hours of community service.

The judgment itself concerned whether this plea deal was procedurally proper as a matter of Latvia law, and it was upheld.

D. Case K77-3055-23. Riga City Court. 17 October 2023.

This case was the prosecution of a company and individual for importing gas cylinders and valves from Belarus in breach of import prohibitions under the EU’s sanctions. The contract value was €73,508.

A senior person within the company, and the company itself were prosecuted and convicted.

The individual was fined €12,400.

The company was fined double that sum – €24,800, and had profits of €9,500 confiscated. This figure is not explained but may have been the profit made from on-selling the imported goods. The company was also banned from conducting any further business with Belarus for a year.

E. Case K12-0283-23. Daugavpils Court. 14 April 2023.

We have posted on this conviction previously.

The case concerned the conviction of an individual for importing 8kg of nails and 13 consignments of railway sleepers from Belarus in breach of the EU’s sanctions.

The man was fined €6,200 and barred from importing any goods from Belarus for a year.

A co-accused was also convicted (the judgment for which could not be found on the case law website) and was fined €5,000 and given a similar ban from importing any goods from Belarus for a year.

F. Case K77-1597-23. Riga City Court. 20 February 2023.

This case concerned the transfer of a professional football player from a Latvian club to a Belarussian club that was 79% owned by a designated person.

The transfer fee was US$50,000.

The player was treated in the judgment as an “economic resource” made available to a designated person in breach of the EU’s asset freeze.

The senior individual at the Latvian club pleaded guilty and was fined €6,200.

The club was also convicted and had the full US$50,000 transfer fee confiscated.

Finland – two convicted of breaching Russian sanctions

The press in Finland has reported the conviction of two individuals for breaching EU trade sanctions with Russia.

The first individual, a Russian national, was given a three-month suspended prison sentence for seven cross-border trips carrying cash and goods.

The second individual, a Belarusian, was given a four-month suspended sentence for attempting to export €22,000 worth of air-cooled condensers.

Luxembourg – CSSF fines bank €1.56 million for sanctions and AML compliance failings

The Luxembourg financial services regulator, the CSSF, has announced today the imposition of a fine of €1.56 million on Banque Degroof Petercam Luxembourg SA.

The fine followed an inspection which started in September 2019, and relates to compliance failings in the context of AML and terrorist financing, and a failure to adequately screen clients for inclusion on EU sanctions lists.

The CSSF noted that remedial steps have been taken by the bank since the inspection of 2019/2020.

© 2009-2025 Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress