France – Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor advances sanctions charges against Lafarge and individuals

On Friday France’s National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office applied to the Paris court to have charges of terrorist financing, and breach of the relevant EU sanctions heard against Lafarge Holcim and nine individuals.

This criminal trial would go ahead before the trial of Lafarge on allegations of crimes against humanity after the Court of Cassation ruled last month that those charges should proceed.

For our earlier posts on the Lafarge matter see here.

France – some charges against Lafarge-Holcim dropped

Further to our earlier posts (here, here, and here) regarding an investigation into whether cement company Lafarge-Holcim breached EU sanctions by making payments to designated persons, it has been announced that the charges relating to financing of terrorism breaches are being discontinued.

The charges relating to crimes against humanity continue.

In October 2022 Lafarge-Holcim had plead guilty to related charges before the US Department of Justice and agreed to pay $778 million.

France – Council of State upholds €50m fine for bank’s sanctions compliance failings

The French Council of State has today dismissed the appeal by Banque Postale against the fine of €50m imposed by the regulator, the ACPR.

The fine was imposed for EU sanctions compliance failings which had permitted designated persons subject to asset freezes to still transfer funds through the use of “money orders”.

This is the largest fine imposed by the French authorities.

See our earlier post in relation to the original fine.

France – banking regulator finds breaches but does not fine

The Sanctions Commission of the French Banking Regulator (the ACPR) has published its decision from disciplinary proceedings against Raguram International.

Between 2015 and 2017, Raguram had failed to conduct KYC on its customers and failed to incorporate the lists of Eu sanctioned persons into its systems and controls framework.

At the time Raguram had not recognised that its controls environment was defective, but it had subsequently implemented stricter policies and procedures and purchased a compliance solution.

As a result of these steps no fine was imposed.

 

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress