Germany – three companies raided

It was reported today that the German authorities have conducted raids in relation to three companies alleged to have made illegal exports to Russian in breach of EU sanctions. Private residences were also raided.

The authorities have not named the companies, but reports suggest one was Smart Impex GmbH which is alleged to have shipped goods destined for Russia via Turkey.

Germany – conviction for exporting cash to Russia

An individual has today been convicted of exporting €11,000 in physical currency from Germany to Russia in breach of Art 5(i)1 of EU Regulation 833/2014.

The individual asserted that he was carrying the currency for the purposes of receiving dental treatment in Kaliningrad.

The judgment takes the view that the exception permitting some cash to be carried “should … be interpreted narrowly”, and that the Commission’s FAQs are a means of discerning the intention of the legislator.

He was fined €4,500 and the balance of the cash above the €500 threshold was confiscated.

Finland – two convicted of breaching Russian sanctions

The press in Finland has reported the conviction of two individuals for breaching EU trade sanctions with Russia.

The first individual, a Russian national, was given a three-month suspended prison sentence for seven cross-border trips carrying cash and goods.

The second individual, a Belarusian, was given a four-month suspended sentence for attempting to export €22,000 worth of air-cooled condensers.

Germany – conviction for importing timber from Myanmar referred to CJEU

A referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union has revealed a conviction in Germany arising from the importation of timber from Myanmar in breach of the EU’s sanctions.

The defendant was convicted and given a suspended sentence of 19 months in prison and a confiscation order of €3,310,902.98 was imposed as well.

The case has been referred to the CJEU because the defendant argues that the timber in question should properly be seen as having been imported from Taiwan, and not Myanmar, because the timber had been processed in Taiwan.

Update: The CJEU case was registered on 8 February 2023.

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress