Switzerland – FINMA revokes licence of merchant bank for AML and sanctions compliance failures

The Swiss financial services regulator has put out a press release announcing its decision, taken several weeks ago, to revoke the licence of MBaer Merchant Bank AG for AML and sanctions compliance failings.

Initially the bank appealed this decision.

In the wake of the US regulator FinCEN announcing that it proposed to name the bank as a “financial institution of primary money laundering concern”, the bank has withdrawn the appeal against FINMA’s decision, and a liquidator has now been appointed to oversee the bank’s liquidation.

Sweden – closed criminal investigation into alleged Russian funds transfers

Press reporting of a civil dispute between Sweden’s SEB Bank and certain Russian customers associated with Olga Pavlova, the Vice-Chair of Gazprom, and relating to attempts to transfer SEK 60 million, has revealed that the same transfers had been the subject of now-concluded a preliminary criminal investigation in Sweden.

It is unclear when the investigation took place, or the basis for the conclusion that no crime had been committed.

Austria – Financial Market Authority partially suspends crypto exchange over lack of AML and sanctions compliance officers

Austria’s Financial Market Authority has announced that its has partially suspended its approval for KuCoin EU Exchange GmbH under the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets regulations.

The suspension means that KuCoin is unable to take on new customers, conclude new contracts, or offer new services.

The suspension is based on the the loss, without replacement, of a Anti-Money Laundering Officer and a Sanctions Compliance Officer.

The FMA has stated that the suspension will remain in place while those positions remain unfilled.

Netherlands – DNB fines imposed on payment services provider upheld on appeal

Further to our earlier post, a payment services provider has brought a further appeal against fines imposed upon it by the Dutch National Bank.

In the previous appeal the original DNB fines of €1.1m and €625,000 had been reduced to €850,190 and €562,500.

Those fines have been upheld in this further appeal.

The defendant company, which had self-reported itself, and which operates ATMs had sought to argue that it was the banks and debit/credit card issuers who had the sanctions screening and due diligence obligations, and that its own self-report could not be used in evidence against it on the basis that it could not be required to incriminate itself.

The court dismissed these objections. The self-reporting had been voluntary and not required and, as a payment service provider, the sanctions compliance obligations also applied to the appellant.

Netherlands – sanctions fine from Financial Markets Authority upheld but reduced on appeal

The Rotterdam District Court has issued its decision in an appeal against a fine imposed by the Dutch Financial Markets Authority (the “AFM”).

Three related fine were initially imposed in 2023 valued at €31,000, €94,000 and €31,000 for a total of €156,000. The fines were for a mixture of compliance failings including, AML, terrorist financing and sanctions. The sanctions compliance failures were a failure to screen customers between 2017 and 2022.

The Claimant, a manager of seven real estate investment funds, appealed against this decision, including (amongst others) on the basis that the fine in relation to sanctions should be struck down because none of the customers were actually subject to sanctions.

The court upheld the fine noting (in machine translation):

“The fact that the AFM’s investigation has shown that the clients of the investment institutions … have not been … on a sanctions list does not detract from the seriousness of the violations either. This circumstance is not relevant to the legal obligations of [Claimant] as gatekeeper in the investigation of those clients and the source(s) of their funds, in order … to comply with the Sanctions Law. The assertion that the [Claimant] often knows the clients personally and that the risks were kept to a minimum … do not detract from this either”.

The fine was, however, reduced by 10% (for a revised total of €148,500) because the enforcement proceedings had taken longer than the 2 years permitted under Dutch law.

United Kingdom – OFSI fines bank £160,000 for Russian sanctions breaches

The UK’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (“OFSI”) has issued a Penalty Notice to the Bank of Scotland fining the bank £160,000.

The bank opened an account for a designated person in February 2023 and then allowed 24 transactions to and from that account to take place between 8 and 24 February totalling over £77,000.

The bank’s screening system missed the fact that the person was designated, using the spelling in the person’s passport that had a different transliteration from cyrillic than used in the UK’s Consolidated List. One of OFSI’s complaints in the Penalty Notice is that the screening tool was insufficiently able to create a “match” despite the spelling variations.

The designation was first identified because the person was identified as a PEP and adverse media searches then revealed the designation. This was not then escalated to be resolved.

OFSI also noted that the in-house training to the Bank’s staff “was out of date and did not reflect risks associated with the contemporary sanctions landscape, such as the heightened risk posed by Russia sanctions post-2022”.

After an investigation into a different account, the Bank identified this particular account as belonging t a designated person and reported a suspected breach to OFSI on 10 March 2023 and an actual breach to OFSI on 16 March 2023.

The fine was first set at £175,000, including a 50% discount for prompt self-reporting, but this was reduced by OFSI, after further representations from the bank, to £160,000.

In the Penalty Notice’s “Notes on Compliance” attention is drawn to the failure to use a sufficiently robust screening tool, the lack of a clear escalation procedure, and the poor training.

The Penalty Notice does not name the designated person, but similarities indicate that this notice relates to the UK’s conviction of Dmitri Ovsiannikov (see our earlier post).

Cyprus – Securities and Exchange Commission refers sanctions cases to police and Attorney General

As part of a press conference setting out the various strands of work conducted by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, information has been provided on sanctions enforcement:

What is more, enhanced monitoring was conducted on entities with current or past exposure to persons subject to EU restrictive measures against Russia.

Cases involving potential breaches of sanctions were forwarded to the police and the attorney general for further investigation, with relevant information also shared with the National Sanctions Implementation Unit established under the new sanctions framework that entered into force in July 2025“.

It was also stated that CySEC had imposed total fines and penalties of 2.3m during 2025 but no information is given to indicate that any of this sum related to sanctions fines. The CySEC website itself does not include the details of any fines in 2025.

Luxembourg – CSSF fines bank €185,000 including for sanctions compliance failings

Luxembourg’s financial services regulator, the CSSF, has issued a fine against Rakuten Bank SA for various compliance failings including sanctions and AML.

One of the failings identified was “accumulated significant and recurring delays in processing alerts relating to customer screening against list of persons subject to restrictive measures in financial matters”. The Notice identified a particular example of a customer subject to anti-terrorism sanctions where the review of the alert took more than six months.

Another failing identified was a failure to “apply ‘without delay’ potential restrictive measures in financial matters”.

Finland – regulator’s audit findings on Nordea Bank’s sanctions compliance

Finland’s Financial Supervisory Authority has published the results of an “audit” on Nordea Bank in relation to the bank’s compliance with the asset freeze and export prohibition aspects of the EU’s Russian sanctions.

The result of the audit was a finding of a “very significant lack of information obtained and retained by the bank”, with a lack of updating on the information that was obtained. In addition, “shortcomings of great significance” were found in relation to customer due diligence, and a lack of adequate assessment of the risk of sanctions circumvention including payments that involved “a high risk country from the perspective of sanctions evasion”.

The announcement from the FIN-FSA does not indicate whether any further regulatory action will be taken.

My thanks to Louis Vargas of the Network for Financial Crime Prevention for informing on this published audit.

Finland – €540,000 fine for sanctions compliance failings by online retailer

The Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland has issued a €540,000 fine to online retailer Verkkokauppa.com for failings under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. As one of the compliance requirements under the act is compliance with EU and UN sanctions, some of the compliance failings identified included a lack of sanctions screening for customers, including high risk customers seeking to pay cash.

The full Decision is here.

My thanks to Aleksi Pursiainen for mentioning this case on the most recent monthly sanctions webinar hosted by the Network for Financial Crime Prevention.

© 2009- Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and are not to be construed as legal advice.

Proudly powered by WordPress