Custodial sentence – European Sanctions Enforcement

May 27, 2025May 27, 2025 by Mark Handley

Netherlands – prison sentence for breaching Russian sanctions nearly doubled on appeal

Further to our earlier post that the Dutch Public Prosecution Service had brought an appeal seeking to extend an 18-month prison sentence for exporting sanctioned goods to Russia, the Court of Appeal in The Hague has now issued its judgment.

While most of the judgment relates to the issue of the amount of the “proceeds of crime” to be confiscated from the convicted defendant (reducing the level of confiscation from €72,697.71 to €71,582.95), the custodial sentence was also increased to detention for 1080 days, which is just under the 3 years sought by the Prosecution.

May 1, 2025May 1, 2025 by Mark Handley

Netherlands – appeal brought to increase 18 month sentence for Russian exports

In an earlier post, we reported on the October 2023 sentence of an individual to 18 months in jail, and a fine of €200,000 imposed on the company operated by the individual.

It is now being reported that an appeal has been brought by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (the “OM”) seeking to increase the sentence.

The OM are seeking a three-year custodial sentence, a five-year ban from the individual acting as a director, and confiscation of €72,697.71 of the proceeds of the sanctions breaches.

It is reported that the appeal is based on the deliberate nature of the offending with the export of sanctioned goods to Russia via third countries including the Maldives and Kazakhstan.

There is no appeal in relation to the fine of €200,000 imposed on Woerd-Tech BV.

April 23, 2025April 23, 2025 by Mark Handley

Estonia – details of eleven Russian sanctions convictions

Further to the earlier post about Estonia having obtained 8 criminal convictions during 2024, we can publish details of the criminal convictions for breaches of the EU’s Russian sanctions that have been published on Estonia’s searchable gazette of published judgments.

As well as one conviction obtained in 2022, below we are publishing summaries of seven of the convictions from 2024 and three from 2025 (not including the conviction made public on 16 April 2025) as well as machine translations of the respective judgments.

The sentences range from fairly small monetary fines up to custodial sentences of 5 years in jail.

Judgment of 10 October 2022 – Petr Rafalovich (a Belarus national) was convicted and given a two month sentence following which he was to be deported to Belarus and given a five-year ban from re-entering Estonia. He was also ordered to pay a penalty and costs of €1,250.40.

The offence was the attempt to export a 3D printer and an electromagnetic positioner. Mr Rafalovich was carrying false papers indicating the goods were destined for an Armenian company, as well as other papers indicating the true recipient to be a Russian company.

Machine translation of judgment

2. Judgment of 5 February 2024 – Victor Manilo was convicted and ordered to pay €2,680 as a fine.

The offence was the attempted export of €14,000 in physical currency to Russia.

Machine translation of judgment

3. Judgment of 14 February 2024 – Galina Sergejenkova was convicted and ordered to pay €3,960, such payment suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. A separate payment of costs and a penalty of €1,434.96 were to be paid straightaway.

The offences were two attempts to transport physical currency (of €900 and €1,000 respectively).

Machine translation of judgment

4. Judgment of 27 February 2024 – Evgeniy Kozlovtsev was convicted and given an eight month sentence suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. He was also ordered to pay a penalty and costs of €1,430.

The offence was the attempted export to Russia of two bottles of wine greater than the €300 luxury threshold. It was the man’s second attempt at such exports.

Machine Translation of Judgment:

5. Judgment of 8 March 2024 – Aleksei Bond was convicted and given a five month prison sentence suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. He was also ordered to pay a penalty and costs of €1,555.

The offence was the attempted export of a luxury watch valued at €13,900 to Russia.

Machine translation of judgment:

6. Judgment of 27 March 2024 – Lev Pylkin was convicted and ordered to pay a penalty of €1,190, as well as confiscation of the cash he attempted to export to Russia.

The offence was the attempted export of €2,560 in physical currency across the border to Russia. He had previously attempted to export cash at which time the details of the offence had been explained. The judgment is the dismissal of an appeal against the conviction and sentence.

Machine translation of judgment

7. Judgment of 17 October 2024 – Ruslan Sibilev was convicted and ordered to pay a fine of €79,557.50 as well as confiscation of a large number of rifle scopes, binoculars and other equipment.

The offences were committed through the acquisition of a range of sanctioned goods from a Portuguese company and an Austrian company, with Sibilev acting to coordinate further transport for the export of the goods to Russia. The orders were placed between May 2022 and April 2023. The total value of the goods ordered was nearly €1 million.

Machine translation of judgment

8. Judgment of 16 December 2024 – Oleg Osipov was convicted and sentenced to 8 months in prison suspended for a probationary period of 18 months. He was also ordered to pay €13,230, including 100% of the fee earned as part of the sanctioned transactions.

The offences were committed through Osipov providing a brokering service for the export of luxury goods to buyers in Russia between May and July 2023. The goods included electrical goods, phones, alcohol, navigation systems and various automotive parts. Osipov contracted with others to deliver the goods and took a brokering fee for arranging the transactions.

Machine translation of the judgment

9. Judgment of 14 February 2025 – Demyan Belyakov was convicted and sentenced to 5 years in jail and ordered to pay €8,231 in costs and other penalties. In addition a large volume of goods were confiscated.

The offences were committed through the actual and attempted export to Russia of hundreds of silencers and firearm flash suppressors between February and June 2024.

Machine translation of judgment

10. Judgment of 20 February 2025 – Andrei Klychkov was convicted and sentenced to serve two months in prison plus a further period of 2 years and 10 months suspended for a probationary period of 4 years. €5,000 was also confiscated and he was ordered to pay costs of €2,581.

The offences were committed by the attempted export of parts for firearms, to Russia.

Machine translation of judgment

11. Judgment of 21 March 2025 – Aleksandr Ivantsov was convicted and sentenced to 4 years, 11 months and 27 days (after deducting 3 days of pre-trial detention) suspended for a probationary period of 5 years and other conditions including a requirement for prior permission to be away from his house for more than 15 days, and permission to leave Estonia. He was also ordered to pay €2,215 and had 70,550 rubles, and other goods, confiscated.

The offence was committed by the attempted export of six pairs of night-vision binoculars.

This case is related to that above for Ruslan Sibilev with Mr Ivantsov being one of the people used to try and physically carry the goods across the border into Russia.

Machine translation of judgment

April 14, 2025April 14, 2025 by Mark Handley

United Kingdom – sentencing for first Russian sanctions convictions

Further to last week’s post, sentencing has now been completed against Dmitrii Ovsiannikov and Alexei Owsjanikow, who were both convicted of breaches of the UK’s sanctions regime.

As per a press release from the Crown Prosecution Service, Ovsiannikov was convicted of 8 counts of breaking the asset freeze imposed upon him as a designated person, and has been sentenced to 40 months in prison for each count with each sentence to be served concurrently. He was also convicted of two charges of money laundering.

The charges relate to the purchase of a car, the payment of private school fees, deposits into bank accounts and insurance.

Alexei Owsjanikow was convicted of 2 of the charges against him, relating to the payment of school fees on behalf of his brother-in-law, and was given a suspended 15 month prison sentence and made subject of a curfew order.

February 17, 2025 by Mark Handley

Netherlands – conviction for breach of ISIS sanctions

On 31 January the Rotterdam District Court published its decision convicting an individual of breaches of the EU’s ISIS sanctions.

The individual was sentenced to 90 days in jail, of which 74 days is suspended for 2 years. Community Service of 80 hours was also imposed.

The transfers giving rise to the offences were US$4,350 and 150,000 Syrian pounds.

The individual was also charged with financing of terrorism and human trafficking.

December 10, 2024December 10, 2024 by Mark Handley

Netherlands – third defendant found guilty in sanctioned aircraft parts export prosecution

Further to our earlier posts from 8 October and 7 October relating to the conviction of a company and individual for exporting aircraft parts to Russia in breach of EU sanctions, the Rotterdam District Court ruled on 22 November that the third co-defendant is also guilty.

The judgment is here.

The individual was an employee of the Ministry of Defence and was first arrested in September 2023 (see our earlier post).

The conviction was based on the export of parts via Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkey the UAE and Serbia. The Defendant was also convicted of falsifying documents and of a minor fire arms charge.

The court accepted findings of PTSD by court psychologists and the probation service.

At sentencing the court stated: “In view of the seriousness of the proven facts, from the point of view of general prevention, a prison sentence of considerable duration is in principle appropriate“.

In the circumstances of the defendant, however, the custodial sentence was limited to the period of pre-trial detention with a further period of 195 days suspended for two years. In addition 240 hours of community service was imposed.

The individual was also disqualified from acting as a company director for three years.

December 9, 2024December 9, 2024 by Mark Handley

Latvia – 2-year jail sentence for breaching designated person’s asset freeze

It is being reported that the Kurzeme District Court has sentenced the Latvian citizen Valentins Rozencovs, to 2 years in jail.

The sentence was that sought by the prosecution, although the case is subject to appeal.

Rozencovs was the editor-in-chief of Sputnik Latvija which is the Latvian branch of Sputnik which operates under the umbrella of a Russian state-owned media company Rossiya Segodnya.

The Director General of Rossiya Segodnya is a designated person (Dmitry Kiselyov), and the prosecution was based on the premise that the provision of services by Valentins Rozencovs was making economic resources available to a designated person, and that Sputnik Latvija was “owned or controlled” by Kiselyov.

This is the latest in a series of prosecutions relating to Rossiya Segodnya – see our earlier posts, here and here.

November 15, 2024November 28, 2024 by Mark Handley

European sanctions enforcement: the custodial sentences

Although one of the filters on this blog is “custodial sentence”, I thought it might be helpful to collect all the examples in one place.

As such, here is the full list of custodial sentences that have been imposed across Europe for sanctions offences since 2017. Please note this excludes suspended sentences.

2017:

Netherlands – 2 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2017/03/14/netherlands-two-year-sentence-for-breach-of-al-qaida-sanctions/
Netherlands – 19 years (although this sentence included numerous other offences): https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2017/04/21/netherlands-19-year-jail-term-upheld-on-appeal/
Italy – 2 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2017/05/03/italy-two-year-sentence-for-arms-exports-to-libya-and-iran/
Italy – two individuals given 3 years and 8 months and 3 years and 6 months respectively: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2017/07/13/italy-sentences-for-arms-exports-to-iran-and-libya/
Netherlands – 16 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2017/09/04/netherlands-fine-and-custodial-sentence-imposed-for-breach-of-iran-sanctions/

2018:

United Kingdom – 2.5 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2018/11/22/uk-three-convicted-of-exporting-military-goods-to-iran/

2019:

Belgium – 12 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2019/02/07/belgium-convictions-for-breaching-syrian-sanctions/
Netherlands – two individuals given 1 month each: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2019/02/18/netherlands-two-companies-and-three-individuals-convicted-of-iran-exports/
Netherlands – 12 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2019/11/05/netherlands-conviction-for-breach-of-isis-sanctions-2/

2020:

Germany – 7 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2020/01/09/germany-seven-year-sentence-for/

2021:

Germany – 3 years and 9 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2021/03/04/germany-convictions-and-fines-for-russian-exports/

2022:

Netherlands – 6 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2022/02/04/netherlands-6-month-custodial-sentence/
Netherlands – 1 year and six months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2022/06/28/netherlands-18-month-sentence-for-exports-to-iran/
Netherlands – 2 years and 6 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2022/08/31/netherlands-30-month-custodial-sentence-for-breach-of-isis-sanctions/
Germany – 1 year and 7 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2022/11/17/germany-conviction-for-importing-timber-from-myanmar-referred-to-cjeu/

2023:

Germany – 5 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2023/08/30/germany-conviction-for-exporting-drone-parts-to-russia/
Netherlands – 1 year and 6 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2023/11/01/netherlands-custodial-sentence-and-corporate-fine/

2024:

Finland – 40 days: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/02/14/finland-conviction-of-russian-national-for-breach-of-the-eu-travel-ban/
Netherlands – 4 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/04/19/netherlands-four-month-prison-sentence-for-breach-of-isis-sanctions/
Germany – 6 years and 9 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/07/18/germany-two-individuals-convicted-of-electronics-exports-to-russia/
Netherlands – 4 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/09/12/netherlands-conviction-for-breach-of-isis-sanctions-upheld-by-court-of-appeal/
Netherlands – 2 years and 8 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/10/07/netherlands-two-years-and-eight-months-sentence-for-exporting-sanctioned-goods-to-russian-airlines/
Germany – 7 years: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/11/08/germany-seven-year-sentence-for-exports-of-military-and-dual-use-goods-to-russia-and-confiscation-of-profits/
Netherlands – 1 year and 3 months: https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/2024/11/11/netherlands-conviction-and-confiscation-for-exporting-sanctioned-goods-to-russian-companies/

Overall the figures are dominated by the Netherlands and Germany with approximately 68 of the 80 years of sentences between them. Indeed, as the graph below demonstrates, other than Finland’s 40-day sentence for breaching a travel ban, the Netherlands and Germany are the only European countries to have sent someone to prison for sanctions offences since 2019.

November 11, 2024November 11, 2024 by Mark Handley

Netherlands – conviction and confiscation for exporting sanctioned goods to Russian companies

The Rotterdam District Court has issued two judgments relating to the conviction and sentencing of an individual for exporting computer goods and software destined for Russian companies via intermediaries in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan.

According to the judgment convicting the individual, the man had been selling computer equipment to two Russian companies prior to 2022. After the goods in questions became sanctioned, a fact he was made aware of by his customs agent, the man directed the exports to affiliates of his Russian customers in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. All the communications, however, remained with the Russian companies.

In an attempt to cover his tracks the man forged a contract between his company and the central Asian entities and provided this in response to questions from his bank.

The court convicted him of the charges, including forgery, holding that the EU Regulations did not require proof that the goods were actually delivered to Russia.

The exports in question were of thousands of items which were either dual-use or luxury goods and were predominantly computer equipment and software.

At sentencing the court made a number of comments:

firstly that “the court looked at penalties imposed in comparable cases, although there is not much comparative material”; and
the court’s aim in sentencing was to “give the suspect a good rap on the knuckles”, but not to hinder the man’s ability to continue operating his business.

The man was given a custodial sentence equivalent to the length of his time served in pre-trial detention (450 days), a suspended sentence of just over 11 months, suspended for two years, and a community service order of 240 hours.

Goods which had been seized during the investigation were returned to him.

The second judgment related to confiscation of the proceeds of crime from the man.

The court calculated that the gross proceeds of the crimes were €1,924,579, from which the court deducted €1,626,269 in what it described as “deductible costs”, leaving a final figure for confiscation of €298,310 which the court considered to be the company’s “profit”. This was the amount the man was ordered to pay by way of confiscation order.

The judgment does not record the Court (or the prosecution) giving consideration to the recent CJEU judgment which upheld a confiscation of the gross proceeds of crime.

November 8, 2024November 8, 2024 by Mark Handley

Germany – seven year sentence for exports of military and dual-use goods to Russia and confiscation of profits

It is being reported that the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart has convicted Ulli S, a 56 year old man, of breaches of the EU sanctions against Russia and the German foreign trade law.

As per our earlier posts, the man was arrested in August 2023, and had been charged in November 2023.

The exports were of machinery which can be used for the manufacture of sniper rifles and other weapons. Some of the exports were sent to Russia via Switzerland and others via Lithuania, while the customs data was falsified.

The contracts for the supply of the goods had been entered into in 2015.

The individual is said to have profited by 2.1 million euros, while a Swiss holding company benefitted by roughly 3 million euros. According to Der Spiegel these sums have been confiscated.

The trial lasted several months and is subject to a possible appeal.