vietnam – Page 27 – Duane Morris Vietnam

October 8, 2015October 16, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

ベトナムで太陽光発電を開発する為の政府の奨励措置オリバー　マスマン（著）ドウェイン・モリス法律事務所

ベトナムは世界の日射マップ上で年間に最も日光があたる地域に位置する国々の中の一国です。特に電力需要や従来の電力生産源への危険性が増加している今、太陽光発電を開発することはベトナムに利益をもたらすでしょう。
再生可能エネルギープロジェクトへの投資を促進する為に、商工省（MOIT）は太陽光発電に対する奨励措置として特に投資資本、税金や土地使用権利に関する首相の第一決定書の草案を提案しています。これらの奨励措置は光電子方法を使用する太陽光発電プロジェクトが適用されます。以下の分析は最新版決定書草案を基にしており、正式決定書が承認された場合更なる変更点があるかもしれません。
投資奨励措置
【投資資本】投資家は太陽光発電プロジェクトへの投資をする為に、国内外の組織または個人から資本を集めることが可能です。このプロジェクトは投資信用と輸出信用奨励措置を受ける資格があります。具体的には、投資家は最大12年間プロジェクトの総投資資本の70％まで融資を申請することが可能です。さらに、投資家はまた最大12年間、輸出入契約価値の85％までを融資という形で輸出信用奨励措置を受けることが可能です。
【輸入税】太陽光発電プロジェクトはプロジェクトの固定資産を生み出す為に商品を輸入する際の輸入税が免除されます。例えば、ベトナムでは入手ができないプロジェクト運営のために必要な部品、材料、半製品などが該当します。
【法人税】現在の税制規則によると、太陽光発電プロジェクトもまた投資奨励措置を受ける分野のプロジェクトと同様に法人税免税または減税の優遇措置を受けることが可能です。例えば、10％の法人税率は15年間適用され、4年以内は免税となり、その後9年間は50％減税などがあります。
【土地】送電線網と繋がる太陽光発電、電線また変電所は特別投資優遇措置の資格があるプロジェクトと同様に土地使用や土地賃貸の免税または減税措置を受けることが可能です。とりわけこの優遇措置にはプロジェクトの開始日から3年以内は土地賃貸の免税が含まれています。
誰が買い手となるのか？
決定書草案によると、ベトナム電力（EVN）または委任された団体が電力購入者となります。電力売買は商工省により規定されたテンプレート版の契約に従い交渉また電力売買契約に署名することによって行われます。契約期間はプロジェクトの運営開始日から20年間となっています。当事務所では商工省のテンプレート版の契約の発行に関してお手伝いをしています。
関税率の供給
EVNは太陽光発電プロジェクトで生産された全ての発電量を電力購買価格がベトナムドンで1,800 VND/kwh から3,500 VND/kWhの間の価格になった時点で購入する責任があります。（これはアメリカセントで12 cents/kWh と16.7cents/kWhに相当します。）
建物の屋根に装置し送電網と繋ぐ太陽光発電プロジェクトに関して、電力生産量が消費量より多い場合は、その差異は3,150 VND/kWhの価格になった時点で購入されます。（VATは含まれず、15cents/kWhに相当します。）この価格はベトナムドンとアメリカドルの変動相場を基に調整されます。電力生産量が消費量よりも少ない場合、送電網から送られる電力は電力購入者が請求される通常の商業価格で購入しなければなりません。
上記の関税供給率はまだアジアのその他近隣諸国と比べると低い状態です。タイでは新関税供給率はタイバーツで90MW以下の太陽光発電の場合5.66THB/kWh（およそアメリカセントで15.7cents/kWh）となります。屋上太陽光では、関税供給率はそのプロジェクトの規模次第で変動します。250から1,000KWの屋上太陽光発電では、関税供給率は6.01 THB/kWh（およそ17 cents/kWh）となります。10から250KWまたは10KW以下の屋上太陽光発電の関税供給率はそれぞれ6.40 THB /kWh（およそ18 cents/kWh）または6.96 THB /kWh（およそ19 cents/kWh）となります。現在の決定書草案によると、ベトナムは屋上太陽光発電プロジェクトの規模の相違に関しては特に何も明記がなく、電力消費と生産量の相違を基に関税供給率を定めています。しかし一方で、フィリピンの屋上太陽光発電に関する関税供給率はベトナムの関税供給率よりも高くなっています。つまり、フィリピンペソで9.68P/kWh（およそ21 cents/kWh）。ベトナムの関税供給率はまだドラフト段階であり、最終版では無い為予測では次の草案では近隣諸国の比率に合わせて修正がされ高くなると思われます。これは投資を誘致する為に極めて重要となっています。
終わりに
決定書草案が承認されれば、ベトナムで太陽光発電を規制する史上初の法的文書となります。ベトナム政府はこの分野への外国人投資家を誘致する為、そして一日あたり5kWh平方メートルという平均日射のベトナムの豊富な太陽エネルギーを最大限に活用する為に努力しています。外国人投資家、アメリカの投資家は特にベトナムのクリーンエネルギーへの投資に注目しています。ベトナム政府はこのプロジェクトの支援を集める必要性に気づき、奨励措置を提供しています。このプロジェクトが短い期間では投資家の期待に応えられないかもしれませんが、この動きは肯定的に取られています。ベトナム、米国及びTPPその他加盟国に影響を与えるTPP開発条約は一般的にエネルギー分野、特にクリーンエネルギーの開発への道しるべとなるでしょう。従って、これらの要因は米国の投資家や同様にTPPの他のメンバーに成長市場そして豊富な投資奨励措置を提供しています。

オリバー　マスマンはドウェイン・モリス・ベトナム法律事務所のディレクターです。取り扱い分野は国際企業税務、発電/水処理プロジェクト、石油・ガス及び電気通信企業、民営化と株式化、M&Aそして多国籍企業のクライアントのベトナムに対する投資とベトナム事業経営に関する一般企業法務を担当しています。ご連絡はomassmann@duanemorris.comにお願い致します。
〈ご注意〉こちらの記事は皆様に情報をお届けする目的でのみ作成・掲載しておりますので、法的なアドバイスとして提供・構成することを目的としておりません。詳細につきましては、当法律事務所の注意書きをご一読下さい。

October 2, 2015October 13, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Lawyer in Vietnam Oliver Massmann Solar Power Vietnam Breaking News: First Ever Regulations GOVERNMENT’S INCENTIVES TO DEVELOP SOLAR POWER PROJECTS IN VIETNAM

Vietnam is among the countries with the world’s highest annual sunshine allocation on the world’s solar radiation map. This is an advantage for Vietnam in its efforts to develop a solar power industry, in the context of increasing demand for electricity and the potential risks of traditional electricity production sources.
To encourage investment in renewable energy projects, the Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) has proposed the first Draft Decision of the Prime Minister on incentives for solar power projects, especially in terms of investment capital, tax and land use rights. These incentives would apply to power generation projects using the photovoltaic method. The following analysis is based on the latest Draft Decision, which will be subject to further changes when the official decision is adopted.
Investment incentives
Investment capital: Investors may mobilize capital from domestic or overseas organizations and individuals to invest in solar power projects. Such projects are entitled to investment credit and export credit incentives. In particular, investors could apply for a loan of up to 70 percent of the total investment capital of their project with a maximum term of 12 years. Moreover, investors could also enjoy export credit incentives in a loan of up to 85 percent of the export/import contract value, also with a maximum term of 12 years.
Import duty: Solar power projects are exempted from an import duty on those goods imported to create fixed assets of the projects; these include components, materials and semi-finished products that are not available in Vietnam and that are needed for the project’s operation.
Corporate income tax: According to current taxation regulations, solar power projects will also enjoy the same corporate income tax exemption and reduction as projects in sectors that are receiving investment incentives. For example, a corporate income tax rate of 10 percent will be applied for 15 years, tax exemptions will occur within four years and taxes will be reduced by 50 percent in the next nine years.
Land: Solar power projects, lines and transformer stations connected to the national grid enjoy the same exemptions and reductions in land use and land rental as projects entitled to special investment treatment. Such incentives, among other things, include exemption of land rental within three years from the operation date of the project.
Who will be the off-taker?
According to the Draft Decision, the Electricity of Vietnam (EVN) or its authorized member units will be the power purchaser. The power sale and purchase will be conducted by negotiating and signing the power sale and purchase agreement according to the template agreement stipulated by the MOIT. Terms of the agreement extend 20 years from the commercial operation date of the project. Duane Morris will continue to monitor the issuance of the template agreement by the MOIT.
Feed-in-tariff (FIT) rate
EVN is responsible for buying the whole electric output from solar power projects, with the electric buying price at the point of electricity receipt to be 1,800 Vietnamese dong/kwh and 3,500 Vietnamese dong/kWh (equivalent to 12 U.S. cents/kWh and 16.7 U.S. cents/kWh).
For solar power projects installed on the roof of a house connected to the grid, if the electricty generated is more than that consumed, the difference to be bought at the point of electricity receipt is 3,150 Vietnamese dong/kWh (not including VAT, equivalent to 15 U.S. cents/kWh). This price will be adjusted based on the fluctuation rate between the Vietnamese dong and U.S. dollar. If the electricity generated is less than that consumed, the electricity received from the grid must be paid at the normal commercial price charged by the electricity purchaser.
The above FIT rate is still low compared to other neighboring Asian countries. In Thailand, the new FIT is THB 5.66/KWh (about 15.7 U.S. cents/kWh) for a solar farm of less than 90MW. For a solar rooftop, the FIT rate varies depending on the capacity of the project. With a solar rooftop of 250–1,000 KW, the FIT would be THB 6.01/kWh (about 17 U.S. cents/kWh). The FIT for solar rooftops of 10–250 KW and less than 10KW are THB 6.40/kWh (about 18 U.S. cents/kWh) and THB 6.96/kWh (about 19 U.S. cents/kWh), respectively. In the current Draft Decision, Vietnam does not draw any difference between the capacity of the solar rooftop projects but sets the FIT rate based on the difference between electricity consumed and generated. Meanwhile, the FIT in the Philippines for solar power projects is also higher than that of Vietnam, i.e., P 9.68/kWh (equivalent to 21 U.S. cents/kWh). As Vietnam’s FIT is still in the drafting process and not yet final, the anticipation is high for this to be amended in the next draft to reach regional levels. This is of vital importance to attract investment.
Conclusion
If the Draft Decision is adopted, it would be the first-ever legal document regulating solar energy in Vietnam. The Government of Vietnam strives to attract foreign investment in the sector and to take full advantage of the plentiful solar energy—an average solar radiation of 5kWh/m2 per day—across Vietnam. Foreign investors, especially those in the U.S, have been eyeing Vietnam for their investment in clean energy. The Government of Vietnam is aware of the need to garner support for these projects and is offering incentives. While these projects may not meet investors’ expectations in the immediate future, the movement appears positive. The developing agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), affecting Vietnam, the United States and 10 other countries, points the way toward a developing energy sector in general—and clean energy in particular. Therefore, these factors suggest a growing market and plenty of investment incentives for U.S investors, as well as other members of the TPP.
Oliver Massmann is the General Director of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC. Mr. Massmann practices in the area of corporate international taxation and on power/water projects, matters related to oil and gas companies and telecoms, privatization and equitization, mergers and acquisitions, and general commercial matters for multinational clients in relation to investment and doing business in Vietnam. He can be reached at omassmann@duanemorris.com.

Disclaimer: This article is prepared and published for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s law firm or its individual partners.

October 1, 2015October 1, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Vietnam Foreign Direct Investment

By Oliver Massmann and Manfred Otto – Duane Morris Vietnam LLC

Foreign Direct Investment

A Brief Overview
Vietnam is undergoing fundamental changes to form the basis for its attractiveness and competitiveness in preparation for the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), the upcoming trade agreements including the EU-Vietnam FTA and the Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPP).
Since July 2015, a number of new laws and regulations governing foreign investment, enterprises, real estate and foreign ownership limits have come into effect. For example, the new Law on Investment and the new Law on Enterprises:
(i) clarify definitions of foreign-invested enterprises;
(ii) facilitate M&A activities;
(iii) reduce the number of prohibited and conditional business sectors;
(iv) reduce statutory business licensing times;
(v) provide more flexibility with regard to corporate governance (such as multiple legal representatives and lower voting thresholds); and
(vi) create more favourable conditions for shareholder lawsuits.
In addition, new laws and regulations affecting foreign ownership of real estate have come into effect. Foreigners can now own apartments and for the first time buy houses. They are now also permitted to sublease and inherit real estate.
With the coming into effect of several international trade agreements and more particularly, the EVFTA, EuroCham members are looking forward to the positive changes that will be implemented and that will further business incentives as well as contribute to Vietnam’s growth.
Vietnam as an attractive FDI destination
In addition to the numerous legal changes, Vietnam has fundamental elements that participate to its continued growth. For instance, Vietnam is in a demographic golden age, with 25% of its 90 million people population between 10 and 24 years old. GDP per capital is increasing drastically as Vietnam has the fastest-growing middle class in South East Asia – (12.9% per annum over the period 2012-2020). Along with a high literacy rate and education levels, comparatively low wages, connectivity and central location within ASEAN, more and more foreign investors choose Vietnam as their hub to service the Mekong region and beyond.
Vietnam’s attractive profile is reflected in its generally welcoming of foreign direct investment (FDI) in manufacturing activities. The gradual opening of most service sectors under Vietnam’s WTO commitments schedule that began in 2007 has been completed in 2015. Domestic law has expanded market access in some sectors beyond those of Vietnam’s WTO commitments. For example, foreign shareholding in public companies that was previously capped at 49% is now generally open for to up 100% foreign ownership. Vietnam also grants investment incentives including tax breaks in areas, such as high-tech, environmental technology, and agriculture, where European businesses are global leaders.
Furthermore, in 2014, Vietnam recorded $21.92 billion in FDI with a total of 1843 investment licenses for foreign invested projects with a registered capital of $16.5 billion, representing a 14% increase from the previous year. Among the foreign investors, the EU is an increasingly important source of FDI for Vietnam as ‘according to the Foreign Investment Agency of the Vietnamese Ministry of Planning and investment, investors from 23 out of 28 Member States of the EU injected a total committed FDI worth US$19.1 billion into 1566 projects over the course of the past 25 years (by 15 December 2014)’. With this strong activity, in 2014, the EU positioned itself as fifth in the top FDI partners of Vietnam with a combined committed FDI of US$587.1 million.

Source: ‘Vietnam’s logistics market: Exploring the opportunities, Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC)

In addition to FDI, the EU-Vietnam’s strong trade relationship can be seen through programmes like the Multilateral Trade Assistance Project (MUTRAP) which accounts for over €35.12 billion. MUTRAP has been instrumental in supporting Vietnam’s negotiating efforts during the WTO accession process and now continues to assist Vietnam in the implementation of trade commitments. In terms of trade, both the EU and Vietnamese businesses are expected to benefit under the EVFTA. The FTA will gradually eliminate tariffs for over 99% of goods and services besides other mechanisms to support bilateral trade. On 4 August 2015, the EU and Vietnam reached an agreement in principle for the free trade deal, an agreement that will also attract further FDI into the country.
Vietnam’s top trading partners 2013

Finally, the EU’s strong commitment to support Vietnam in its modernisation and integration in the world economy is mirrored by the aid programmes. In line with Vietnam’s 2020 socio-economic plan, the EU has increased its aid by 30 % reaching 400 million euros via its multi-annual indicative programme for the period of 2014-2020 focusing on the development of clean energy in Vietnam.

Further improvements necessary
It is clear that Vietnam’s development and its attractiveness to foreign investors are undeniable as Vietnam is constantly improving its business environment.
However, as of this writing, guiding regulations for many new laws have still not been published, and investors are experiencing delays in the processing of applications. We expect processing times to improve once the new implementing regulations come into effect and officials get accustomed to the changes.
Another issue that has been highlighted by our members is that many foreign investors still face significant challenges when dealing with Vietnam’s bureaucracy. Tax filing, customs clearance, business registration and licensing, and other administrative procedures are often delayed, outcomes can be unpredictable, and businesses find themselves spending resources on administration that they would prefer to invest in expanding their core activities.
Despite remaining hurdles, the national government of Vietnam has expressed an understanding of the issues surrounding foreign investment. Providing foreign investors increased access to its market, the stream of FDI is expected to continue. For many foreign investors the positive economic development of the country and its fundamentals substantially outweigh potential risks.
In this light, EuroCham wishes to present the key issues that our members face in their activity in Vietnam along with some key recommendations. EuroCham hopes to engage in a constructive dialogue and increasing cooperation with the relevant authorities on all the issues presented in this edition in order to improve the business environment for all enterprises in Vietnam and contribute to the country’s fast modernisation.

***

1‘Vietnam; from golden age to golden oldies’, UK FOC, 07/01/15. Available at
2‘Report revises 2014 FDI figures’ Viet Nam News, 18/03/15. Available at
3‘Investment -EU-Vietnam economic and trade relations’, Delegation to the European Union to Vietnam, 2015. Available at
4‘Vietnam’s logistics market: Exploring the opportunities, Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC), 20/01/15. Available at
5‘Trade – EU-Vietnam economic and trade relations’, Delegation to the European Union to Vietnam, 2015. Available at
6‘European Union, Trade in goods with Vietnam’, European Commission DG Trade, 10/04/15, p.9. Available at
7‘Development Cooperation’, Delegation to the European Union to Vietnam, 2015. Available at

Continue reading “Vietnam Foreign Direct Investment”

September 28, 2015September 28, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Lawyer in Vietnam Oliver Massmann New Decree Guiding Enterprise Law on Enterprise Registration – Quicker Timeline and Simplified Procedure

On 14 September 2015, the Government issued Decree No. 78/2015/ND-CP on enterprise registration (“Decree 78”). This is a long-awaited decree guiding the 2014 Enterprise Law, replacing Decree No. 43/2010/ND-CP on enterprise registration and Decree No. 05/2013/ND-CP amending Decree No. 43/2010/ND-CP on administrative procedures. Decree 78 will take effect on 01 November 2015. Some positive changes of this new decree are discussed below:
Enterprises are now able to register their operation online
Online enterprise registration is a procedure carried out by the owner of the enterprise or the enterprise itself via the National information gate on enterprise registration.
Online enterprise registration dossier includes the same documents as required by the paper dossier and are converted into electronic form. Online enterprise registration dossier has the same validity as the usual paper one.
Who can execute the enterprise registration documents
The 2014 Enterprise Law allows enterprises to have more than one legal representatives. Signature of each legal representative in enterprise registration documents has the same legal validity. In addition, not only the owner of the enterprise but also the enterprise itself (through its legal representative(s)) could execute the enterprise registration documents and holds responsible for the lawfulness, accuracy and truthfulness of the declared information in the dossier.
Decree 78 no longer requires enterprises:
– Register changes in enterprise registration content within 10 working days from the date the enterprise decides on the changes, except as otherwise required by law;
– Submit their financial statements to the business registration authority in accordance with the law.
Role of the Request for enterprise registration and the Enterprise Registration Certificate (ERC)
The ERC concurrently serves as the Tax Registration of the enterprise and the ERC is not a business license. In case there is any inconsistency between the electronic ERC, Branch Registration Certificate, Representative Office Registration Certificate, Certificate on business location and the paper ones, the one which records information in the enterprise registration dossier has legal validity.
Each enterprise is issued with an enterprise code indicated in the ERC. This code is no longer the business registration code but tax code of the enterprise.
Simplified enterprise registration procedure
In an attempt to reforming administrative procedures and fighting against corruption, Decree 78 clearly states that the enterprise registration authority is not allowed to request for additional documents or other documents not required in the enterprise registration dossier by the law. In this regards, the number of required documents in the application dossier is also reduced significantly.
Time to get an ERC after submission of a valid dossier is shortened to three working days instead of five working days as previously. However, it needs to be seen in practice whether the authority sticks to this timeline.
In case there is any change to the business lines of the enterprise, it does no longer have to register the new business lines but only needs to notify the authority on the same. The notification dossier removes documents confirming the legal capital by the authority in case the new business line requires legal capital; or a valid copy of the certificate of practising for individual according to the specialized areas.
Notably, in a joint stock company, if a founding shareholder has not fully paid for the registered shares, it will automatically no longer be company’s shareholder and its name will be removed from the list of founding shareholders of the company.
***
Please do not hesitate to contact Oliver Massmann under omassmann@duanemorris.com if you have any questions or want to know more details on the above. Oliver Massmann is the General Director of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC.

September 21, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

ベトナムの弁護士　オリバー・マスマン電力部門における分配の自由化－ビジネス参入のチャンス？

1. 近年の電力・ガソリン・石炭配給の独占状態が解消することにより経済上で期待される好影響は何か？
「回答」ベトナム電力市場では、ベトナム電力（EVN）が電力送電、配給に関して独占状態であると知られており、ベトナムは未だにオングリッド独自の電力計画で生成される全ての電力をENVが購入するといった一人売り手形態の特徴があります。投資家はEVNと電力売買契約（PPA）の交渉をすることは非常に困難だと認識しています。一方でEVNはペトロベトナム社とヴィナコミン社に対し膨大な負債をし続けています。
　国家独占状態を対象とする商品やサービスのリストの採用はEVNの電力独占状態に制限をすると予想されています。国家は多目的水力発電や原子力発電、送電の運営などと同様に巨大発電所の国家電力システムの事業運営をすることで独占状態を維持してきましたし、社会経済や国防、国家安全保障に関して非常に重要性を持っていました。石油やオイルの取引はもはや国家独占の対象となりません。
　これは市場介入への国際協定やいくつかの国営企業の民営化計画に従い、政府にとってポジティブな動きでもあります。政府は2016年の初めに施行予定のベトナムの電力卸売市場への一歩を踏み出しました。電力市場に今後多くの投資家が参入すると予想されています。消費者は誰から電気を購入するかという選択肢が増えていくでしょうし、競争性が高く、公平な電力市場が徐々に形成され、結果として非常に魅力的な投資環境になっていくと期待されています。
2. 個人投資家、特に外国人投資家にとってどのように重要となるか？
「回答」競争性が高く、参入しやすい市場になることで、外国人投資家はこの分野への投資をより魅力的に感じるでしょう。もはや生成した電力をEVNに販売する必要がなくなり、他の配給会社へ売ることや、独自のシステムを介して配給、送電することが可能になります。
　外国人投資家はまたEVNと電力価格の交渉をするといった障害から解消されます。近年のバンベト証券株式会社の調査によると、ベトナムの電力小売価格は2005年の781VND/kWh (3.5 US cents/ kWh)から2015年には1,622VND/kWh (7.3 US cents/ kWh)と、この10年間で約2倍に上昇しましたが、カンボジア、タイ、シンガポールなどAPECの他国に比べるとまだ低い状態です。これが投資家にとってこの分野に出資するのを躊躇う主な原因となっています。しかし、投資家の為の資本の回復と合理的な利益を確保することを目的とする電力事業計画によると、電力価格は2016年から値上げする予定です。従って、電力小売価格は2020年には8-9 US cents/ kWh値上げするとみられ、今後5年以内に18.4％まで上昇すると予想されています。電力価格は市場の需要、供給を反映し、外国人投資家は投資決定しやすくなると期待されています。
3. 経済の独占状態を減少させるためにベトナム政府に対してどのような助言があるか？
　ベトナムは市場経済の地位を確立している途中段階です。この目的を実現するために、政府は市場への介入を制限し、公正な競争性を作り出し、独自に運営可能な市場にする必要があります。多くの国々では、公正な競争性は独占状態の可能性を制限することにより作り出されています。もし単に政府が市場状況に応じて価格変動だけを許可する場合は、独占状態がさらに続き、市場に影響を及ぼす可能性があります。また、価格規定や独占状態の減少と同様に、政府は民営化計画を促進させ、投資家たちの為に真の競争性の高い市場を作りだす必要があります。
〈ご注意〉こちらの記事は皆様に情報をお届けする目的でのみ作成・掲載しておりますので、法的なアドバイスとして提供・構成することを目的としておりません。詳細につきましては、当法律事務所の注意書きをご一読下さい。
オリバー・マスマンはドウェイン・モリス・ベトナム法律事務所のディレクターです。ご質問等はomassmann@duanemorris.comまでご連絡ください

September 15, 2015September 15, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Foreign ownership of houses and condominium in Vietnam is now possible

Vietnam – You are a foreigner and want to buy a House or Condominium ?
Come to us! We help you to succeed

Since 1st July 2015 two new laws are in place, the Law on Real Estate Business and the Law on Residential Housing. Those laws allow foreigners to purchase Real Estate, Houses and Condos. On 10 September 2015, the Decree implementing the Law on Real Estate Business is adopted, shedding light on provisions of the related law. The guidance will start taking effect from 01 November 2015. For other provisions that have not received any implementation guidance yet, the Ministry of Construction instructed the authorities to follow the new law and until the new implementation rules are available, the new law should be implemented according to the old implementation guidelines as long as it does not breach the new law. Details will be explained below.

1. The right to own property

The Law on Residential Housing provides that foreign individuals who are permitted to enter the country are allowed to own property in Vietnam. They should also not belong to the category who are entitled to preferential treatment rights, or diplomatic or consulate immunities in accordance to law. The Government will issue a detailed guidance on how foreign individuals could provide its eligibility to own property in Vietnam. This guidance is, unfortunately, not in place yet.

Foreign investors and organizations are allowed to purchase real estate with an investment purpose. The investor or organization will need an Investment Certificate (or Investment Registration Certificate under the new Investment Law). From a general perspective, domestic investors or foreign investors who already have existing projects in Vietnam can easily meet easily this requirement. However, it could be problematic for investors who make first time investment in Vietnam with the investment project being the transferred one.

In general, there are two different possibilities to become owner of property in Vietnam. The first option is to make investment in construction projects of residential housing in Vietnam. The second option is to purchase the house or condo after its completion of construction.

The Law on Residential Housing is granting even more rights to foreign individuals who are married to a Vietnamese citizen, whereas they have the same rights as Vietnamese citizens and have the opportunity to purchase property on a long-term basis.

2. Restrictions

It must be noted that foreigners can only own houses for a duration of 50 years. The Government puts an exemption in place and can decide itself after application if and for how long it will extend the ownership duration.

Under Article 161.2(a) of the Law on Residential Housing, foreign individuals and foreign invested enterprises are able to purchase multiple properties in a residential development project including buildings and separate landed villas/townhouses. The maximum quantity allowed to purchase is 30% of the total units in a building and 250 houses in a local area. However, Article 68.4 of the fourth Draft Decree of the Law on Residential Housing limits that foreign organizations/ individuals may only own maximum 10% of the total number of individual housing in each residential housing project. This could be a restriction not in compliance with the Law on Residential Housing.

Another restriction in the fourth Draft Decree of the Law on Residential Housing is also introduced. While Article 159.2(b) of the Law on Residential Housing only prohibits foreign individuals and organizations from buying houses in national defense and security area, Article 67 of the fourth Draft Decree of the Law on Residential Housing does not allow them to own residential houses in areas where foreigners are prohibited or restricted from residing or traveling as stipulated under the Law on Residence and Travel.

The development of this regulation needs to be awaited.

—o0o—

Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Oliver Massmann under omassmann@duanemorris.com; if you wish to take the opportunity and purchase property or if you have any questions on the above. Oliver Massmann is the General Director of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC.

September 10, 2015September 10, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Lawyer in Vietnam Oliver Massmann Liberalization of Distribution in Power Sector – Your Chance to get into business ?

1. What positive impacts will the absence of the current monopoly in distribution and production of power, petrol and coal have on the economy?

Answer: In Vietnam’s energy market, EVN has long been known as the state monopoly in transmission and distribution of electricity. Vietnam still features the Single Buyer Model with EVN’s purchase of all electricity generated from on-grid independent power projects. Investors find it extremely hard to negotiate the Power Purchase Agreement with EVN. Meanwhile, EVN keeps operating at loss with huge debts to PetroVietnam and Vinacomin.
The adoption of the list of goods and services subject to state monopoly will then limit the power of EVN. The State only maintains its monopoly over the operation of multi-purposes hydropower and nuclear power plants, transmission, facilitating as well as operation of the national electricity system of big power plants and those having special importance in terms of socio-economic and national defence and security. Trading in petroleum and oil is also no longer subject to state monopoly.
This is a positive movement of the Government in accordance with its international commitments on market access and its plan on privatization of certain state-owned enterprises. The Government has taken a step closer to Vietnam Wholesale Electricity Market, which is aimed to be launched at the beginning of 2016. More players will participate in the power market. The consumers would have more choices from whom they will buy electricity. A competitive and fair power market will be gradually formed, resulting in greater attraction to investment.

2. How important is it to private investors, especially foreign ones?
Answer: With an open and competitive market, foreign investors will find it more attractive to invest in this sector. They are now no longer required to sell the electricity they generate to EVN but can sell it to other distribution companies or even transmit/ distribute through their own system.
Foreign investors will also no longer face obstacles in negotiating the power price with the EVN. According to a recent report by Ban Viet Securities Joint Stock Company, although power retail price in Vietnam has doubled during the past ten years, from VND 781/kWh (3.5 US cents/ kWh) in 2005 to VND1,622/ kWh (7.3 US cents/ kWh) in 2015, this is still low compared with other countries like Cambodia, Thailand, and Singapore in the APEC. This is among major reasons that discourage investors from pooling their capital into the sector. However, power price is planned to increase from 2016 according to power increase schedule, which aims to ensure capital recovery and reasonable profits for investors. Accordingly, power retail price may increase at 8-9 US cents/ kWh in 2020, equivalent to an increase by 18.4% within the next five years. Power price should also reflect the demand and supply in the market. Foreign investors then find more incentives when making their investment decision.

3. What is your recommendation for Vietnam’s government to reduce its monopoly over the economy?
Vietnam is on its way to obtain its market economy status. In order to realize this objective, the Government should limit its intervention in the market, create fair competition and allow the market to operate on its own. In many countries, fair competition is created by limiting the possibility of monopoly. If the Government only allows the price to fluctuate according to the market situation, there will still be monopolies dominating and influencing the market. Then, together with the price policies and reduction in its monopoly, the Government should expedite the privatization process, make it substantial in nature to effectively create a real competitive market for the players.
***
Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Oliver Massmann under omassmann@duanemorris.com if you have any questions on the above. Oliver Massmann is the General Director of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC.

September 7, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Anwalt in Vietnam Oliver Massmann Bergbau

Vietnams Wirtschaft hängt stark vom Bergbau ab. Die Direktive Nr. 2/CT-TTg vom Januar 2012 und das Dekret Nr. 15/2015/ND-CP sowie ein Besuch des australischen Premier Ministers haben die Bedeutung der Benutzung von modernen und hochtechnologisiert Bergbaugerätschaften hervorgehoben. Trotzdem ist die Gesetzgebung, welche den Bergbausektor betrifft sowohl für ausländische als auch für lokale Investoren ungünstig, vor allem gibt es hohe Lizenzgebühren und Steuern sowie weitere Abgaben, auf die im Folgenden eingegangen wird:
• Zahlung für das Bergbaurecht: Um das Abbaurecht für beispielsweise Erz zu erhalten, müssen die Unternehmen gemäß dem Dekret Nr. 203/2013/ND-CP eine Zahlung von 1-5% des Wertes des reinen Erzes tätigen. Diese Abgabe ist nicht praktisch und wird ausländische Unternehmen davon abhalten in die Bergbauindustrie zu investieren. Der Grund dafür liegt wohl darin, dass viel zu viel für die Abbau- und Bergbaugerätschaften bezahlt werden muss. Dementsprechend werden die Investitionen in die Werkzeuge reduziert, da man die Abgabe aufbringen muss. Als Resultat daraus werden keine fortschrittlichen und umweltfreundlichen Technologien von den Abbaufirmen verwendet, was in einem nicht effektiven Abbau resultiert. Das Gesagte vorangestellt, wird der Regierung empfohlen, dass Dekret zu erlassen und die Abgabe auf jährlicher Basis zu verlangen und diese erst nachdem Abbau eintreiben.
• Umweltschutz-Abgabe: Das Circular Nr. 158/2011/TT-BTC ist die Rechtsgrundlage für eine Umweltschutzabgabe, welche sich nach Menge des Rohmetalls Erz auf jährlicher Basis berechnet. Die Berechnung dieser Abgabe beruht einzig auf den Abbaumengen, nicht auf der eigentlichen Umweltverschmutzung durch die jeweilige Miene. Diese Verordnung ist nicht gerecht, Bergbauunternehmen, die modernere und umweltschonende Technologie nutzen und damit einen geringen Einfluss auf die Umwelt haben, zahlen den identischen Betrag wie Bergbauunternehmen, die veraltete Gerätschaften haben und die Umwelt zerstören. Diese Regelung fördert nicht das Bedürfnis von Bergbauunternehmen in neue Technologien zu investieren oder gar die Umwelt zu schützen. Das Circular sollte sich darauf beziehen, dass die Umwelt-Abgabe auch den wirklichen Umweltverschmutzungen Rechnung trägt und daran gemessen wird.
• Lizenzgebühren auf Mineralstoffe: Gemäß der Resolution Nr. 712/2013/UBTVQH13 hat sich die natürliche Ressourcensteuer für viele Mineralien deutlich erhöht, z.B. für Wolfram (18%), Titan, (16%), Kupfer (13%), Eisen (12%), usw. Obwohl die natürliche Ressourcensteuer für Gold, Silber, Aluminium, Bauxite, Zinn, Blei und Zink nicht gestiegen ist, liegt sie bei 10%. Zusätzlich hat das Finanzministerium entschieden, dass die Abbausteuer für natürliche Ressourcen bis zum 1. Januar 2016 für fast alle Rohstoffe um 15-50% steigen soll. Das wird die Steuerlast von Bergbauunternehmen erheblich erhöhen und es ist sehr gut möglich dass einige Unternehmen insolvent gehen. Deshalb sollte die Regierung diese Veränderung noch nicht verabschieden.
• Körperschaftssteuer für Bergbauunternehmen: Das Dekret Nr. 122/ND-CP, welches eine Vielzahl der Paragraphen des Regierungsdekrets Nr. 124/2008/ND-CP verbessert und ergänzt, indem es detailliert und richtungsweisend die Einführung einiger Artikel des Gesetzes für Körperschaftssteuer Nr. 14/2008/QH12, reduziert die Unternehmenseinkommenssteuer auf 25%, ausgenommen sind jedoch Bergbauunternehmen welche kostbare und rare natürliche Ressourcen abbauen, bei diesen liegt die Steuer bei 50%. Mit dem neuen Dekret, soll die Steuer auf 40% reduziert werden, was notwendig ist, da mehr als 70% der Bergbauunternehmen in wirtschaftlich schwierigen Regionen liegen. Das Dekret besagt jedoch auch, dass es für den Abbau von Mineralien keine weiteren Vergünstigungen geben wird.

Die Lizenzgebühren, Abgaben und Steuern, welche Bergbauunternehmen in Vietnam zahlen müssen sind hoch, es ist jedoch unklar wie diese eingefordert werden und was im Anschluss daran mit den Geldern passiert. Die Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft ist nicht darüber informiert, was mit den Verwaltungsgebühren geschieht. Die Umweltschutz-Abgabe sollte dafür genutzt werden, dass die Umwelt der Mienen wieder aufgebaut wird, denn deshalb zahlen die Unternehmen diese Abgabe. Die Regierung sollte mehr Informationen veröffentlichen bzgl. der Lizenzvergabe und finanziellen Verpflichtungen welche die einzelnen Bewerber für die Bergbaulizenz haben.

Weiterhin sollte die Regierung zurzeit keine Steuererhöhungen anstreben, denn die Erhöhungen und die Lizenzgebühr werden dazu führen, dass es immer weniger Investoren in der Bergbautechnologie gibt. Im Gegenteil, es wird weiterhin die veraltete Technologie genutzt, was genau entgegen der Direktive des Premier Ministers läuft.

Zusammenfassend kann gesagt werden, dass die Regierung, um mehr Investitionen im Bergbausektor und die Nutzung von neuerer Technologie zu fördern, eher die Art der Steuereintreibung kontrollieren sollte, anstatt die Steuern zu erhöhen, sowie mehr Transparenz in der Gestaltung der Abgaben und Steuerverwaltung anstreben sollte.

***
Oliver Massmann ist Generaldirektor und Partner der US Kanzlei Duane Morris in Vietnam. Herr Massmann spricht fließend verhandlungsfest Vietnamesisch und arbeitet seit 20 Jahren als Wirtschaftsanwalt in Vietnam. Sie können Herrn Massmann erreichen unter: omassmann@duanemorris.com

VIELEN DANK !

September 7, 2015September 8, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Lawyer in Vietnam Oliver Massmann New Vietnam investment law won’t help public sector

“As only a minority of the shares is offered for sale, the investors are not quite interested.” Oliver Massmann, General Director, Duane Morris Vietnam LLC
A new investment law that took effect in July is likely to keep investment flowing to Vietnam’s private sector but won’t help Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung achieve this year’s target for selling minority stakes in several hundred public-sector firms.
Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung’s push to sell minority stakes and reduce bloat in nearly 300 Vietnamese state-owned firms by the end of the year is unlikely to be successful despite recent reforms in business laws implemented in July that make it easier for foreign investors to acquire companies.
“This seems to be an ambitious target as the number of privatized enterprises is only 61 in the first six months of 2015,” Oliver Massmann, general director at the Hanoi office of corporate law firm Duane Morris LLP, tells MGO via email. “Moreover, as only a minority of the shares is offered for sale, the investors are not quite interested in the transaction, especially when they would not have any decision-making power or their involvement in the management of the enterprise is very limited.”
Public sector firms account for 30 percent of Vietnam’s GDP, and the country has been seeking to privatize and restructure them in order to reduce their debt, confine spending to core business activities, and help them acquire strategic foreign partnerships. According to a piece Mr. Massmann wrote for industry magazine The Asia Miner last year, state enterprises own 70 percent of property in Vietnam and account for 60 percent of commercial bank credit.
But despite initiating the process of restructuring and reforming public firms several years ago, Vietnam has been unable so far to address a number of factors that are hampering the divestment process.
Vietnam law continues to cap foreign ownership at 49 percent in listed firms, which many public sector enterprises are. And in most cases Vietnam is not selling stakes anywhere near the 49 percent limit — or even large enough to give investors decision-blocking powers.
In addition, it remains difficult for investors to value the shares that are being offered, given the lack of adequate audit reports. As a result, the Vietnamese Ministry of Finance is carrying out valuations of each firm. As recently as last month, Asian Development Bank’s chief economist Aaron Batten noted that only 8 percent of state firms publish financial reports on their websites, according to a report in the English-language daily Viet Nam News.
Due to these unresolved factors, Vietnam also fell short of its disinvestment target in 2014. Now, with stock markets in the region wobbly, public sector firms are likely to have an even harder time than they did last year, when as many as 143 firms were able to privatize some shares, according to Vietnamese media reports.
Mr. Massmann clarified, however, that the lack of investor interest in public enterprises comes against the backdrop of an improved overall investment and business climate in the country.
The 2014 Investment Law, which went into effect July 1, does away with something called an investment certificate, a business registration for foreign investors that was supposed to be approved in 45 days but in practice took four to six months to process, according to Mr. Massmann’s firm.
The law has also reduced the number of “conditional” business activities, areas of the economy in which investors have to seek approval with provincial planning departments. Construction, urban planning and education continue to remain conditional activities, but even in these sectors, acquisitions should become much easier, business analysts say.
Meanwhile, earlier tax law changes have also drastically cut the hours businesses spend on tax preparation and filing,
Vietnam has made “positive changes to improve the business environment and strengthen the economy’s ability to compete in 2015 and 2016,” Mr. Massmann tells MGO.
The apparel and textile manufacturing sector has drawn a large share of investment this year and is likely to continue to do so. Seafood processing, electronics manufacturing and retail and banking are also likely to attract investment into next year.
Mr. Massmann also foresees that the government will try to make investing in state firms more attractive by increasing the share of equity for sale, something that has so far been resisted by the management of many state firms, who perhaps fear that equity shares that allow for closer scrutiny of corporate governance could expose poor management or even corruption.

***

Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Oliver Massmann under omassmann@duanemorris.com if you have any questions on the above. Oliver Massmann is the General Director of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC.

September 7, 2015 by Dr. Oliver Massmann

Anwalt in Vietnam Oliver Massmann Personalentwicklung Arbeitsrecht

Das neue Gesetz zur Sozialversicherung wird am 1. Januar 2016 in Kraft treten und einige radikale Veränderungen mit sich bringen, welche als gut für Vietnam betrachtet werden, sowie sich internationalen Standards anpassen. Es wird unter anderem um den Ausbau der Anwendung der Sozialversicherungspflicht gehen, sowie weitere Vorschläge um die Transparenz der Sozialversicherungspolitik zu verstärken, z.B. das Recht der Arbeiternehmer ihr Sozialversicherungsbuch selbst zu führen, die Verpflichtung des Arbeitgebers die Informationen bzgl. der Zahlungen in die Sozialversicherungskassen alle sechs Monate, es müssen Schritte getan werden, um die Sozialversicherung von der Arbeitslosenversicherung abzutrennen, usw.

Um sicher zu gehen, dass diese Veränderungen sowohl von den Arbeitnehmern als auch von den Arbeitgebern verstanden werden, sollte das Ministerium für Arbeit, Kriegsveteranen und Soziales beratend tätig sein und die Veränderungen gegenüber der Geschäftswelt kommunizieren, indem die Veränderungen gemeinsam besprochen werden. Es sollte eine direkte Interaktion mit den Arbeiternehmern und Arbeitgebern während des Entscheidungsfindungsprozesses geben sowie ein Vertrauen für eine Sozialversicherungsagentur gebildet werden. Das würde den Arbeitgebern die Möglichkeit geben dem Arbeitnehmer die Situation besser erklären zu können.

Mit Respekt auf die ausländischen Arbeiter wurde das Dekret Nr. 102/201/ND-CP, dem Arbeitsgesetzt von 2013 folgend, kürzlich veröffentlicht und weitet die Normen des Arbeitsgesetztes auf ausländische Arbeiter aus. Während das Dekret klarstellt unter welchen Voraussetzungen Arbeitsgenehmigungen erstmalig und wiederholt ausgestellt werden können, sind einige Punkte weiterhin offen, diese sollten folgendermaßen gelöst werden:

• die Gestaltung der Wiedererlangung der Arbeitserlaubnis sollte einfacher sein und es sollte möglich sein, dass man mindestens 30 Tage vor Ablauf der alten Arbeitserlaubnis eine neue beantragt, damit Bewerber genug Zeit haben um sich im Anschluss daran um das Visum bzw. Aufenthaltsgenehmigung zu kümmern,
• Trainees, welche in Vietnam arbeiten, und Freiberufler, welche für mehre Unternehmen in Vietnam arbeiten, werden von dem Dekret nicht erfasst,
• das Erfordernis eines staatlichen Führungszeugnisses sollte nur für Arbeitnehmer gelten, die länger als sechs Monate in Vietnam sind,
• die Genehmigungszeit für den „foreign labour demand report“ sollte anstatt sechs Wochen maximal 15 Tage dauern,
• die Dokumente, die benötigt für die Erteilung der Arbeitserlaubnis werden sollten von der Art des Arbeitsverhältnisses abhängen, wie zum Beispiel ob es sich um Ausländer handelt, die unter das Arbeitsgesetz fallen, Unternehmensinterne Austauschverträge, Dienstleistungsverträge, Ausländer, die weniger als 90 Tage in Vietnam arbeiten, usw.
• das Verfahren, wie die Arbeitserlaubnis ausgestellt wird, sollte vereinfacht werden, und
• es sollten verständlichere Richtlinien für Bewerber und Auszubildende geben, welche die Aufgabe haben die Arbeitserlaubnis auszustellen.

Bitte nehmen Sie zur Kenntnis, dass die bald kommende ASEAN Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft einen großen Einfluss auf das Einstellungsverhalten in bestimmten Job Kategorien bis Ende 2015 haben wird. Das Ministerium für Arbeit, Kriegsveteranen und Soziales sollte die Kommunikationskanäle offen lassen und mit der Geschäftswelt zusammenarbeiten damit sowohl die kommenden Möglichkeiten als auch die Herausforderungen bewältigt werden können.

—o0o—

Bitte zögern Sie nicht und kontaktieren Herrn Massmann unter omassmann@duanemorris.com falls Sie Fragen zu dem oben gelesenen haben sollten. Oliver Massmann ist Generaldirektor von Duane Morris Vietnam LLC.